Next Article in Journal
Reversion of MRAP2 Protein Sequence Generates a Functional Novel Pharmacological Modulator for MC4R Signaling
Previous Article in Journal
Acute Dehydration Impairs Performance and Physiological Responses in Highly Trained Judo Athletes
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Reproductive Biology of Dry Grassland Specialist Ranunculus illyricus L. and Its Implications for Conservation

1
Department of Botany, Physiology and Plant Protection, Faculty of Biotechnology and Horticulture, University of Agriculture in Krakow, 29 Listopada 54, 31-425 Krakow, Poland
2
Department of Ornamental Plants and Garden Art, Faculty of Biotechnology and Horticulture, University of Agriculture in Krakow, 29 Listopada 54, 31-425 Krakow, Poland
3
Department of Plant Ecology, Institute of Botany, Faculty of Biology, Jagiellonian University, Gronostajowa 3, 30-387 Krakow, Poland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Biology 2022, 11(6), 873; https://doi.org/10.3390/biology11060873
Submission received: 19 April 2022 / Revised: 28 May 2022 / Accepted: 4 June 2022 / Published: 6 June 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Developmental Biology)

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

The Ranunculus illyricus—Illyrian buttercup—is threatened with extinction in many countries and measures should be taken to protect it. In order to increase the effectiveness of such measures, it is necessary to know the methods of propagation and to evaluate their efficiency. R. illyricus reproduces generatively by seed and vegetatively by clusters of progeny tubers. The method and potential of vegetative propagation are described here for the first time and compared with the potential and actual effectiveness of generative propagation. Both the generative and vegetative propagation methods should be used to strengthen existing populations and create replacements.

Abstract

Ranunculus illyricus, a component of xerothermic grasslands, is a declining species and deserves active conservation treatments in many countries preceded by studies on the biology of its reproduction. So far, our knowledge of R. illyricus, a species with two modes of reproduction, has been fragmentary. The purpose of the studies presented here was to describe the annual development cycle of R. illyricus with particular emphasis on the production of underground tuber clusters that serve as vegetative propagation. Based on three-year-long observations in an ex situ collection, the efficiency of vegetative propagation was estimated and compared with the efficiency of generative propagation. It was found that in 3 years the best clones could produce up to 57 progeny clusters followed by flowering specimens in the first season. Meanwhile, the high potential for generative reproduction was suppressed by many limitations including fruit setting, the germination capacity of seeds, seedling survival rate, and additionally, the first flowering plant was observed only in the third year. It seems that the efficiency of vegetative propagation of this species can be higher than the efficiency of generative propagation. Moreover, vegets bloomed in the first year after emergence, whereas the first plant of generative origin was observed to bloom only after 3 years. A large proportion of individuals of vegetative origin can negatively affect the genetic diversity of the population but their survival rate against competing plants is higher. To enhance the existing populations or to create new ones, it would be best to use plants derived from clonal propagation of genets carried out in ex situ conditions.

1. Introduction

Anthropogenic pressure in the environment leads to the loss and fragmentation of natural habitats, invasion of alien species, overexploitation of resources, environmental pollution, and climate change. As a result, more and more species are becoming extinct. According to various studies, it is estimated that about 8% [1] up to one-third of plant species are at risk of extinction, including most of those that have not yet been described given their limited ranges and local rarity [2,3]. In many cases, it is necessary to implement active conservation programs, and their effectiveness depends on the extent to which the biology of the species and threats in the environment are recognised [4]. Reproductive biology directly affects wild populations because reproductive success and certain life cycle traits (longevity, offspring recruitment, and survival) determine population survival and growth, whereas the life form and mode of reproduction affect the level of genetic diversity and distribution within and among populations [5].
Currently, natural and semi-natural grasslands are highly threatened plant communities as a result of conversion to cropland, afforestation, spontaneous succession, and urbanisation. It is estimated that at least 50% of all grasslands in Central and Eastern Europe have disappeared in the last 200 years. These communities are extraordinary refuges of biodiversity. In Europe, 29% of all bird species are associated with grassland habitats, calcareous grasslands and steppes are home to 63% of butterfly species, and among Europe’s >6000 endemic vascular plant species, grassland species make up the second-largest group (18.1%) [6,7].
One of the species inhabiting xerothermic grasslands, steppes, and dry sunny slopes is Illyrian buttercup (Ranunculus illyricus), a clonal herb in the family Ranunculaceae, section Ranunculastrum, subgenus Ranunculus (Ranunculus) [8]. It is classified as a dry grassland specialist and referred to as an indicator species of “flowery, meadow steppes” [9,10,11]. It also occurs in synanthropic habitats, such as burial mounds [12] or old graveyards surveyed in the Pannonian ecoregion [13,14].
The main range of occurrence covers most of the countries of the Balkan Peninsula, central Italy, Romania, Ukraine, the European part of Russia (in the south), and Turkey. Scattered populations occur in many European countries, such as Sweden, Germany, the Czech Republic, Slovakia, Hungary, and Slovenia, where it is most often considered an endangered species [15,16]. In Poland, it is a rare and critically endangered species subject to legal protection and currently occurs only in two locations [17,18]. The resources of this species, closely linked to xerothermic grasslands, are decreasing throughout its whole range.
The Illyrian buttercup is easy to recognize due to strong, grey-white hairs on the aboveground parts, also on its three-petaled leaves. It is a perennial classified as a geophyte with a relatively short growing season from April to June, and a flowering period typically between May and June; yet, soon after fruiting, the plant dries up. It is a monoecious, bisexual, and insect-pollinated plant, which reproduces by seeds or vegetatively using underground stolons at the base of the shoot [16,19]. Flowers typical of the genus Ranunculus, with the calyx sepals characteristically bent downwards, are self-incompatible [19]. The fruits of this species are one-seeded achenes, whose morphology and anatomical details were described by Mourad et al. [20] and Gherghişan [21].
The Ranunculus genus comprises species rich in alkaloids with essential oils containing a high percentage of fatty acid (mainly hexadecanoic acid), phytol, and hydrocarbons [22,23,24]. The herb of R. illyricus is used for medicinal baths because it contains coumarins (umbelliferone) with antibacterial properties [25].
Although R. illyricus is known to develop stolons and storage roots, there is no information available on the developmental biology of its underground parts and the recruitment mode of vegetative progeny. As an endangered species in most of its range and as a potentially useful plant (medicinal and ornamental), R. illyricus deserves a more detailed understanding of its reproductive biology. The objectives of this study are (A) to describe the biology of the species, and (B) to assess and compare its ability to reproduce generatively and vegetatively in order to verify the hypothesis that the two reproduction modes of this species are equally effective. Understanding the plant’s reproduction system can help conservation and management strategies because plant populations may be greatly impacted by limitations related to generative or vegetative reproduction. Reproductive output is defined as the number of individuals produced in the following growing seasons, i.e., seedlings in generative reproduction (genets) and clusters of progeny tubers (PC) in vegetative reproduction (ramets).

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Plant Material and Growth Conditions

The research was carried out on an ex situ population of Illyrian buttercup (R. illyricus) grown in a collection at the Faculty of Biotechnology and Horticulture of the University of Agriculture in Kraków. The cultivated plants represented the population coming from Miernów—one of the Polish natural populations [16,17]—and the plant material was received from the Botanic Garden of the Jagiellonian University in Kraków.
Individual tagged plants were grown in pots of a 7 cm diameter containing peat substrate and deacidified peat (1:1). That was the standard soil used throughout the experiment. Plants were cultivated in open-field conditions, naturally covered by snow during winter. The pots with the plants were watered and over the years of observations, the data describing the thermal conditions in the collection were recorded. The experiment was established in the autumn of 2016 and observations of aboveground and underground parts were conducted for three consecutive seasons (in 2017 and 2018 for all clones, whereas in 2019 for randomly selected clones) (Figure 1). The observations allowed describing the annual development cycle under ex situ conditions.

2.2. Vegetative Reproduction

In autumn 2016, 39 tuber clusters were planted. Each year, during the dormancy period (September/October), the plants were taken out of the pots and the development of the underground parts was evaluated: the number of progeny tuber clusters (PC), the fresh matter (FM) of the mother (MC), and progeny tuber clusters (PC), as well as the number of tubers in the cluster. Each cluster was then replanted separately in new pots and labelled so that the clones derived from a single parent plant could be tracked throughout their development. The data collected in this way allowed us to not only describe the vegetative development of individual clones but also to compare the underground organs (tuber clusters) produced during three consecutive years in each age group of clusters: new, one-year, and two-year clusters of tubers. The clusters labelled “new” were those that were produced as new progeny in a given season, e.g., the clusters planted in the autumn of 2016 had produced entirely “new” clusters by the autumn of 2017. Those replanted in the autumn of 2017, in turn, were “one-year” clusters in 2018. Throughout the manuscript, a cluster of tubers represents one individual (plant). What is meant by vegetative offspring is a progeny cluster of tubers (PC)—ramets—produced by the mother cluster of tubers (MC).

2.3. Generative Reproduction

During flowering, the proportion of flowering individuals in the population, the height of flowering stems, and the number of flowers per plant were assessed (2018, 2019); in the tagged flowers (n2019 = 20), the stamens and pistils (n2017= 25; n2018 = 24; n2019 = 72 flowers) were counted followed by the fruit set. The efficiency of seed formation was calculated as the ratio of the number of mature achenes to the number of all pistils, expressed as a percentage.

2.3.1. Pollen Quality (Production and Viability)

The anthers were isolated from the breaking buds of the non-tagged plants (Figure 2h) to evaluate the quality of the pollen. The viability of the pollen was assessed on the day of harvest by the indirect staining Alexander method [26], in which red-stained pollen is considered viable and green is considered unviable. Data were collected during three growing seasons. Assessments were made in three replicates, each prepared as a pollen mixture from 10 flowers. The viability of 300 pollen grains from each replicate was assessed using a Zeiss Axio Imager M2 microscope (Carl Zeiss, Jena, Germany). Photographs were taken using an EOS 450D Digital Camera (CANON, Tokyo, Japan).
Pollen production was estimated for the stamens that were sampled before anther dehiscence (Figure 2h). A mixture of 10 stamens from 10 flowers was placed in a 1.5 mL Eppendorf tube and dried at room temperature. After dehiscence, 1.0 mL of distilled water was added and the content was vortexed immediately prior to counting pollen grains using a Bürker haemocytometer [27]. The number of pollen grains in one anther was calculated according to the following formula:
A = (X × Ve)/(Vc × n)
A = (X × 1000 μL)/(0.1 μL × 10)
where:
  • A—number of pollen grains per anther,
  • X—average number of pollen grains per counting field,
  • Ve—total volume of the pollen grain solution in a 1 mL (1000 μL) Eppendorf tube,
  • Vc—volume of the counting field of 0.1 mm3 (0.1 μL),
  • n—number of stamens in the Eppendorf tube.

2.3.2. Seed Viability and Ability to Germinate

The viability was assessed for 30 seeds using the tetrazoline method [28]. The achenes were soaked in water for 24 h, then the pericarp was removed and seeds were soaked in tetrazolium for another 24 h. The seeds whose endosperm and embryo were completely red were considered to be alive, whereas those that were partly red or white were treated as dead.
Ripe one-seeded achenes were tested for their ability to germinate using the blotter test in Petri dishes in conditions of a 16/8-hr day/night photoperiod [29]. The influence of the factors interrupting the seed dormancy was evaluated. In 2017, the effects of germination temperature (10 °C or 20 °C) and warm stratification were evaluated immediately after harvest (soaking in a 50 °C bath for 2 min prior to sowing). The impact of low-temperature stratification (4 °C for a period of four weeks) and pre-sowing conditioning with gibberellic acid (1.0 × 10−3 mM, for 24 h) was evaluated in 2018. The results were recorded after four weeks. The experiment was repeated four times for each factor (combination) using four Petri dishes with five seeds for each combination.

2.3.3. Development and Survival of Seed-Derived Plants under Ex Situ Conditions

A month after sowing (18 July 2018), 25 seedlings with cotyledons obtained from the blotter test were planted individually into pots in the same soil as the mother plants. They were cultivated for 4 weeks in a Sanyo vegetative chamber (Sanyo-Onoda, Japan), under a 16/8-hr day/night photoperiod and photon flux density of 45 µmol m−2 s −1, a temperature of 24 ± 2 °C, and humidity of approximately 60%. The plants were then moved to an unheated greenhouse and in spring, after overwintering, transferred to a field collection. The survival rate and development of aboveground and underground organs of the seed-derived plants were observed in subsequent growing seasons (2018–2021) and the number of clusters and tubers per cluster were recorded.

2.4. Statistical Analysis

All statistical analyses were performed with STATISTICA v. 13.3. The normality of data in groups was tested with the Shapiro–Wilk test. The homogeneity of variance in the groups was tested by employing the Levene test. When comparing the groups with a normal distribution and homogeneity of variance, parametric tests (ANOVA and Tukey or Student t-test) were used. However, when comparing the groups characterised by the lack of a normal distribution or the lack of homogeneity of variance, nonparametric tests (Kruskal–Wallis and Dunn’s test or -Mann–Whitney U test) were applied. A correlation analysis was also performed where the Pearson correlation coefficient r was determined. Details of the tests used are provided in the captions of tables or figures. The significance level was α = 0.05.

3. Results

3.1. Annual Development Cycle

Under experimental conditions, R. illyricus develops a system of fibrous roots underground, some of which accumulate storage materials (starch) and develop into tuberous roots (Figure 2b–e). The unmodified roots are annual, whereas the storage roots form perennial tuber clusters with a perennating bud in the central part. In addition, the stolons, which are the organ of vegetative reproduction of this species, can form at the base of the developing bud in autumn (Figure 3).
At the end of June, the whole aboveground part, the unmodified roots, and the underground stolons connecting the clusters of mother tubers with the progeny die. The plant takes the form of a cluster of tubers with a dormant perennating bud on top (Figure 2a). Dormancy occurs in summer until the beginning of autumn (July–September) and lasts for at least three months. At the end of September, new roots emerge at the base of the regenerating bud, followed by underground shoots. The dormant bud meristem also becomes active and starts to grow (Figure 2b,c). One month later (in October) the roots reach about 10 cm. At this time, the stolons are shorter than the roots (up to 5 cm), and are thicker and more rigid (Figure 2c,d). In November, the tuber clusters have a developed abundant root system and several-centimetre-long shoots—greenless and hidden under the soil surface (Figure 2d).
In some seasons, the shoots develop leaves above the soil surface and thus overwinter (Figure 2e). The further development of the aboveground parts proceeds in parallel with the further development of the stolons and the formation of progeny clusters. At the end of April, the aboveground vegetative shoots are developed and the stolons end in clusters of progeny tubers underground. The stolons reach a length of 15–20 cm and are divided into 4–5 internodes. At the nodes, single, reduced leaves are visible in the form of scales. Clusters of progeny tubers are formed at the top of the stolon (always one cluster on one stolon). The progeny cluster has only one regenerating bud in the central part, opposite the stolon (Figure 3). The growth of inflorescence shoots occurs in May, whereas the beginning of flowering falls in the third week of May (Figure 2f). The flowering of the population lasts about 3 weeks (to the beginning of June), and the flowering of a single flower, from the opening of the bud to the falling of the perianth and stamens, takes 6–8 days (Figure 2g–j). After ripening and drying of the fruit (Figure 2k), the whole aboveground part dies and the plant starts the summer dormancy period again.

3.2. Vegetative Reproduction

Labelled tuber clusters and their annual monitoring allowed us to track the life history of individual clones and to estimate their ability to reproduce vegetatively in subsequent years. Of the 39 tuber clusters planted in 2016, 90% had survived by 2017, 70% by 2018, and 64% by 2019. This shows that R. illyricus ramets can survive at least 3 years under ex situ conditions.
The potential for vegetative propagation was detailed using the example of the clone designated “11” over three years (Figure 4). Each season, an average of 3.3 progeny clusters were produced per plant, with a maximum of 5. During this time, a total of 57 progeny clusters (ramets) were produced from a single mother cluster (clone 11). We observed that each ramet could produce progeny clusters for at least two years (Figure 4).
However, the clones differed in vegetative potential. Some of the plants died off without forming progeny clusters. In general, in the plants that had reproduced vegetatively, an average of 8 (between 3 and 19, depending on the clone) progeny clusters were formed from a single cluster after 2 years, and after 3 years 13–51.
It was not only the clone that affected the number of PC developed but also the age of the cluster. The age of the cluster also determined its FM, the number of tubers in the cluster, and the number of flowers per plant. One-year-old clusters had the highest number of tubers, which was much lower in the two-year-old clusters as was the FM of the cluster (Table 1). Younger tuber clusters also produced more flowers, although not all flowers in both age groups set fruit (Table 2).
To determine whether the size of planted clusters can determine the mode of reproduction in the next season, the plants were evaluated in two age groups in 2018. The plants indicated as ”new” in 2017 (n = 64) are “one-year-old” in 2018, whereas the “one-year-old” plants in 2017 (n = 31) are “two-year-old” in 2018 (Table 3). It turned out that most individuals reproduced both vegetatively and generatively in 2018 (VG in Table 3). In the group ”one-year-old” in 2018, 63% reproduced this way, whereas in the group “two-year-old” in 2018, it was 49%. However, there were some that reproduced only vegetatively (36 and 35%, respectively), or only generatively (3 and 16%, respectively).
It turned out that the FM of one-year tuber clusters did not co-vary the mode of reproduction in the following year. However, the FM of the younger clusters—“new” clusters—did. In that case, clusters with a higher FM produced individuals that reproduced only generatively (G), and clusters with a lower FM produced individuals that reproduced only vegetatively (V)—Table 3. Moreover, next year in this age group, the tuber FM of the VG individuals was significantly higher than that of the V individuals, which may be due to differences in the FM of the clusters planted a year earlier. However, the VG plants also produced more clusters of tubers (2.7) than the plants reproducing only clonally (1.6). It is puzzling why flowering individuals produced more clusters of higher FM. It could be expected that the allocation of resources to the organs of generative reproduction will have a negative effect on the tuber FM. However, it seems that the additional photosynthetic area of leaves on a flowering shoot meets the needs of generative reproduction as well as the accumulation of storage materials. Plants that reproduce only vegetatively develop only a rosette of leaves.
The height of the inflorescence shoot, the number of flowers, and the percentage of fruit-bearing flowers were the same regardless of the mode of reproduction (G or VG) in both age groups (Table 3).
Temperatures in the months when the development of the aboveground part took place (March, April, and May) affected the FM of the clusters. Higher temperatures in March positively influenced their FM, but higher temperatures in April and May decreased the tuber FM (Table 4, Figure 5). The data suggest that March can be the main month for tuber formation. Assuming optimum plant watering, the negative effects of higher April and May temperatures can be explained by the intensification of developmental processes other than the accumulation of storage materials, for example, faster shoot growth or more numerous flower buds.

3.3. Generative Reproduction

3.3.1. Flowering and Fruit Setting

During the 2018 growing season, 57.6% of the individuals flowered, whereas in 2019, 85.0% of the individuals flowered; the non-flowering individuals developed only a rosette of leaves. The flowering plants had a single stem with one to four flowers, yet some of the flowers did not set fruit—Table 3. On average, the number of stamens was 66, whereas the number of pistils was 147 (138–156), without seasonal variations. The viability of pollen was 53.6–68.5% depending on the year (Table 5). The diameter of the alive (red) pollen grains was larger than that of the unstained, dead pollen grains (Figure 6a). The production of pollen was abundant as almost 140 thousand pollen grains were obtained from one flower (Table 5).
The species is characterised by a high potential for generative reproduction due to the high number of developed pistils in the flower, the number of stamens, and numerous pollen grains with relatively high viability varying across seasons. On the other hand, the seed-setting efficiency, although varying from season to season, was low (the highest was 12.8%) and therefore a small number of fruits formed from numerous pistils (Table 5).

3.3.2. Seed Germination

The seeds of the Illyrian buttercup were 100% viable (Figure 6b) but germinated with difficulty. The best germination rate was obtained when the seeds were germinated at a reduced temperature (10 °C), and also those that were subjected to cold stratification germinated relatively well (Table 6 and Table 7).

3.3.3. Development of Seedlings under Ex Situ Conditions

R. illyricus seeds germinated between 10 to 18 days after sowing. The seeds germinated epigeically and one month after sowing most of the seedlings had cotyledons (Figure 7a,b). In the first year, plants produced aboveground a rosette of juvenile leaves (3–12 leaves) (Figure 7c,d) and a fibrous root system belowground (Figure 7e). In some cases, the formation of elongated tuberous storage roots was observed in autumn (Figure 7f). In the first year (2018), the mortality of seedlings was high; only 50% survived the first winter (Figure 7g).
In the spring of the second year (2019), the active plants produced leaves but none of the plants flowered. The plants had thickened roots underground and half of them produced stolons terminated with progeny clusters of tubers but only one per plant.
In the third year, generative reproduction occurred for the first time but only one seed-derived plant flowered. All three-year-old seedlings produced progeny clusters with 5–15 tubers (Figure 7h). In the next growing season, the number of tubers in clusters was higher, on average 15 for three- or four-year-old clusters and 9.5 for two- and one-year-old clusters.

4. Discussion

This article presents R. illyricus, a species with a wide geographic range throughout Europe and also Asia. However, in many countries, this species, associated with xerothermic grasslands, is rare and to various degrees under threat of extinction. So far, however, little is known about its reproductive biology and the available data are only fragmentary [30,31,32].
In order to carry out effective active conservation measures, it is necessary to recognize the threats not only to individual habitats but also to the biology of plant reproduction, which will fully reflect the existing causes of population decline [4,33,34]. In Poland, this species is an extremely rare plant considered to have been extinct for several decades (EX category) [16]. All the more valuable are the two populations discovered later: one is located in a steppe reserve (the Skorocice reserve) and the other on a kurgan in an agricultural landscape (the village of Miernów) [17,18]. The second population is particularly exposed to all adverse changes observed in such a type of habitat: progressive succession, eutrophication, invasion of alien species, intensive agrotechnical treatments, and isolation [35,36]. The observations described here were made on an ex situ collection representing Polish natural resources of R. illyricus from the Miernów site.
Ranunculus illyricus is a species with potentially two modes of reproduction: vegetative and sexual. An analysis of data collected over three seasons of observations allowed us to describe the full annual vegetative cycle of R. illyricus with particular emphasis on the development of underground vegetative organs. The underground-forming rhizomes ending in clusters of tubers are used for vegetative reproduction and as storage resources.
The number of PC produced is a measure of the efficiency of vegetative propagation. It was found that a single cluster can live for at least three years and produce PC each year. The number of clusters produced varied across clones but also depended on the age of the MC. One-year-old clusters had the highest reproductive potential and produced on average about 2.3 progeny clusters. Two-year-old tuber clusters were already characterised by a lower reproductive capacity, which may be due to their declining storage resources: they counted fewer tubers and had lower FM and they also flowered less (Table 1, Table 2 and Table 3). It has also been shown that external factors can indirectly affect the efficiency of vegetative propagation. The number and FM of tubers were positively correlated with March temperatures. Warm spring months stimulate earlier development of the aboveground vegetative part, which accumulates the produced resources at that time in the formed underground organs. Presumably, water resources could also modify the efficiency of vegetative reproduction (and this is probably the case in natural populations); however, the ex situ collection was regularly watered and observations were conducted under optimal watering conditions.
The potential efficiency of generative reproduction depends on numerous factors related to the development of the plant, such as the number of viable pollen grains formed and the number of developed pistils in the flower, as well as the number of developed flowers, among others. In the case of R. illyricus, numerous pistils and a large number of pollen grains with fairly high viability were formed, but this potential was not fully exploited. Although fruit-setting efficiency varied in successive growing seasons, it was always low and did not exceed 12.8%. The low fruit set may be a consequence of the lack of effective pollinating insects, but it may also be a result of a low genetic variation of the plants in the collection. The collection contained clones that reproduced vegetatively—no individuals of generative origin appeared. Since R. illyricus is a self-incompatible species [19], the genetic homogeneity of the population is a factor that significantly limits the efficiency of generative reproduction. In future, it should be verified what the efficiency of the generative reproduction of this species is and what the proportion of individuals of generative versus vegetative origin would be in natural populations. In the course of our observations, other limitations to generative reproduction have also been noted. Not all developed flower buds opened (Table 3) and set fruit. It is difficult to judge whether this is the result of environmental factors or perhaps a programmed dying of lateral flower buds, which has been described for Ranunculus bungei as well as other species in the family Ranunculaceae [37] at early stages of inflorescence differentiation.
Further limitations to generative propagation arise from the difficulty in germinating seeds that enter dormancy. Of the dormancy-interrupting factors tested, the best results were observed with a low (10 °C) germination temperature or the interaction of stratification with GA3 application. Based on this, it can be concluded that favourable conditions for germination in the wild are created by a cool autumn in the year of seed shedding or by the spring of the following year. A low temperature is a factor that contributes to the breakdown of abscisic acid, which is a germination inhibitor. GA3 is a plant-growth regulator, an antagonist of abscisic acid, and has been repeatedly used to break seed dormancy [38,39,40,41] for R. asiaticus. A high temperature, which positively stimulated the germination of R. asiaticus seeds [42], proved to be an ineffective factor in breaking the R. illyricus dormancy in our studies.
Assuming the most optimistic parameters affecting the efficiency of generative reproduction in ex situ conditions: the number of seeds per flower—19, and the germination capacity of the seeds—40%, it takes seeds from more than three flowers (3.3) to obtain one flowering individual after 3 years. In turn, in the example of clone 11, after one year, on average 3.3 PC develop from one MC, and after three years up to 57. In addition, plants derived from vegetative propagation take up growth and flower already in the first year after formation. With such assumptions, it can be concluded that most individuals, also in natural populations, are of vegetative origin.
The vegetative way of reproduction ensures the survival of vegetative progeny among strong competitors (i.e., grasses). In xerothermic grassland populations, vegetative reproduction is dominant [43]. Seedling development is rare because of strong competition [44,45]. Vegetative reproduction is expensive, as evidenced by the high allocation of mass to the production of vegetative progeny but ensures almost 100% reproduction success. This situation is a classical illustration of the trade-off rules—greater investment in the progeny increases their chances of survival [46]. It also happens that the efficiency of the generative reproduction of xerothermic grassland species is very high, but their populations decline in the face of strong competition and changes in habitat use [40]. In this case, the introduction of grazing or mowing on xerothermic grasslands with the removal of green matter could positively affect the survival of seedlings on natural sites and at the same time increase the genetic diversity of the population.
Two other species with similar biology can be used as a reference point to evaluate reproductive processes: R. asiaticus and Ficaria verna (i.e., R. ficaria). R. asiaticus occurs naturally on the Mediterranean coast and is widely cultivated as an ornamental plant [47]. F. verna, on the other hand, is a component of the spring undergrowth of deciduous forests native to Europe and Asia, whereas in North America it is an eradicated invasive species [48]. All three species can be defined as perennial geophytes with monocarpic aboveground stems adapted to seasonal climatic changes. F. verna was also found to exhibit low efficiency of generative reproduction [32], which does not prevent it from occurring in large numbers thanks to its efficient vegetative reproduction. It is known that in undisturbed communities this mode of reproduction dominates and effectively ensures the survival of plants, e.g., the perennial undergrowth of deciduous forests [49,50] or the steppe perennial in the temperate zone [43].
The development of the underground organs of R. illyricus—tuberous roots and stolons—is somewhat reminiscent of R. asiaticus, which also undergoes a period of dormancy during hot and dry summer months. During wet and cool months, the plant goes through a generative phase and develops stolons and tuberous roots [31,47,51]. However, the vegetative buds of this species are located in the external leaves of the rosette and give rise to the growing point of the tuberous roots. The tuberous roots can be divided but the annual multiplication rate is only 2–5 [47] making vegetative reproduction of this species less efficient than generative reproduction. The flowers of R. asiaticus with over 30 stamens and circa 660 pistils are capable of producing almost 500 achenes for some cultivars and none for others. Therefore, the efficiency of generative reproduction in this species depends on the breeding system of the cultivar [52] and poses a challenge to horticultural production rather than species conservation.
Our research has shown that R. illyricus can be successfully propagated under ex situ conditions and plant material can be obtained for active conservation treatments. The plants grown can be used depending on whether they are needed to enhance existing populations or to establish new ones for replacement populations. The vegetative propagation of the species is very efficient and produces a large number of progeny plants in a short time (each season, up to 3–4 progeny plants could be produced per mother plant). Although generative propagation is limited by low fruit-setting efficiency and low seed-germination capacity, it is also possible to obtain progeny plants in this way. R. illyricus is described as a self-incompatible species, so it is worth making such an effort to increase genetic diversity within the population and to facilitate cross-pollination between individuals representing different genotypes. Mature achenes can be collected from natural sites or a conservation collection, but it is doubtful that their direct sowing on natural sites can bring satisfactory results. Rather, we recommend that collected seeds should be further handled under ex situ conditions and stratified and/or germinated in low temperatures. The resulting seedlings and later adult plants and their progeny should be carefully labelled and cultivated as separate clones (progeny of one individual of generative origin). Such a procedure requires at least a few years; in our study, the first progeny clusters were formed in two-year-old plants obtained from seed, whereas all three-year-old plants were vegetatively propagating. The first plant obtained from seed also flowered only after three years. It is important to maintain an ex situ plant collection over a long time with the aim of gradually increasing genetic diversity (by obtaining seedlings), and at the same time some plants representing the different clones can be used to feed natural populations. Currently, we have 17 clones obtained from seed in our collection. Based on the observations of the seasonal cycle of R. illyricus, the optimal time for conservation measures involving the introduction of plants into the environment may be the dormancy period, which lasts about three months from July to September. It is recommended to plant dormant clusters of tubers in plots cleared of turf, a dozen or so at a time, mixing plants belonging to different clones.
The method of active conservation of R. illyricus proposed in the manuscript can be applied to different populations of this species, both in Poland and throughout its geographical range, where the species is losing natural resources. In our opinion, it may also be useful for various species requiring conservation and, in particular, to plants that pursue two modes of reproduction. Rare species having rapidly declining populations undergo a loss of genetic diversity that can have demographic consequences. Therefore, it is preferable to reintroduce plants using seedlings as it is most beneficial for enriching the genetic variability of the population being enhanced or restored [53,54]. However, this is not always easy due to the limitations of generative reproduction, e.g., lack of a partner for mating in self-incompatible plants, low pollination success, or low germination rates [4,55,56,57]. For example, in the clonal species Lysimachia asperulifolia, an effective population feeding treatment was carried out using rhizomes (ramets) [58]. In this case, it can be assumed that if plants were obtained from seed at an earlier stage and then propagated vegetatively, the use of such material would not only contribute to an increase in population size but also to n enhanced genetic diversity. However, each species and even population requires individual treatment and prior recognition of biology and threats [4].

5. Conclusions

  • This is the first time the annual developmental cycle of R. illyricus has been described, allowing us to present its ability to reproduce both generatively and vegetatively.
  • The efficiency of vegetative propagation ex situ depended on the age of the tuber (clone) and indirectly on weather conditions. After three years, the best clones could produce up to 57 progeny clusters, which flowered in the first vegetative season, but the regeneration potential of the tubers started to decrease in the case of the two-year-old tubers.
  • The high potential of R. illyricus for generative reproduction was limited by low seed-setting efficiency under ex situ conditions and difficulties with seed germination and seedling survival. In addition, the first flowering plant of seed origin was observed in the third year after planting.
  • Vegetative reproduction was more effective than generative reproduction because more progeny clusters could be obtained during one season and they were able to propagate through both reproduction modes in the following season.
  • The best way to increase the natural resources of this species would be ex situ generative propagation followed by vegetative propagation of the resulting plants.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, E.S. and D.K.; methodology, D.K. and E.S.; validation, E.S., D.K. and B.N.; formal analysis, A.K., D.K., B.N. and E.S.; investigation, D.K., E.S. and B.N.; resources, K.T.; data curation, D.K. and E.S.; writing—original draft preparation, D.K., E.S. and B.N.; writing—review and editing, E.S., D.K., B.N. and A.K.; visualization, E.S. and D.K.; supervision, E.S. and B.N. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Ministry of Education and Science (SUB/2021-22-050012-D011) to support the maintenance and development of the research potential of the Department of Botany, Physiology and Plant Protection.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Chapin, F.S.; Zavaleta, E.S.; Eviner, V.T.; Naylor, R.L.; Vitousek, P.M.; Reynolds, H.L.; Hooper, D.U.; Lavorel, S.; Sala, O.E.; Hobbie, S.E.; et al. Consequences of changing biodiversity. Nature 2000, 405, 234–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Pimm, S.L.; Joppa, L.N. How many plant species are there, where are they, and at what rate are they going extinct? Ann. Mo. Bot. Gard. 2015, 100, 170–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Corlett, R.T. Plant diversity in a changing world: Status, trends, and conservation needs. Plant Divers. 2016, 38, 10–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Massey, J.R.; Whitson, P.D. Species biology, the key to plant preservation. Rhodora 1980, 82, 97–103. [Google Scholar]
  5. Hamrick, J.L.; Godt, M.W. Effects of life history traits on genetic diversity in plant species. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 1996, 351, 1291–1298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Török, P.; Dembicz, I.; Dajic-Stevanovic, Z.; Kuzemko, A. Grasslands of Eastern Europe. In Encyclopedia of the World’s Biomes; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2020; Volume 3, pp. 703–713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Dengler, J.; Biurrun, I.; Boch, S.; Dembicz, I.; Török, P. Grasslands of the Palaearctic biogeographic realm: Introduction and synthesis. In Encyclopedia of the World’s Biomes; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2020; Volume 3, pp. 617–637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Hörandl, E.; Emadzade, K. Evolutionary classification: A case study on the diverse plant genus Ranunculus L. (Ranunculaceae). Perspect. Plant Ecol. Evol. Syst. 2012, 14, 310–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Erdős, L.; Tölgyesi, C.; Dénes, A.; Darányi, N.; Fodor, A.; Bátori, Z.; Tolnay, D. Comparative analysis of the natural and seminatural plant communities of Mt Nagy and other parts of the Villány Mts (south Hungary). Thaiszia J. Bot. 2014, 24, 1–21. [Google Scholar]
  10. Moskal-del Hoyo, M.; Mueller-Bieniek, A.; Alexandrowicz, W.P.; Wilczyński, J.; Wędzicha, S.; Kapcia, M.; Przybyła, M.M. The continuous persistence of open oak forests in the Miechów Upland (Poland) in the second half of the Holocene. Quat. Int. 2017, 458, 14–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Lachashvili, N.J.; Khachidze, M.N.; Eradze, N.V.; Khetsuriani, L.D. Steppe of Tbilisi environs (East Georgia, South Caucasus). Ann. Agrar. Sci. 2017, 15, 332–338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Bede, Á.; Csathó, A.I. Complex characterization of kurgans in the Csanádi-hát region, Hungary. Tájökológiai Lapok 2019, 17, 131–145. [Google Scholar]
  13. Kovács, D. Adatok Magyarországflórájához I. (Data to the flora of Hungary I.). Kitaibelia 2014, 19, 254–259. [Google Scholar]
  14. Molnár, A.V.; Löki, V.; Máté, A.; Molnár, A.; Takács, A.; Nagy, T.; Lovas-Kiss, Á.; Lukács, B.A.; Sramkó, G.; Tökölyi, J. The occurrence of Spiraea crenata and other rare steppe plant in Pannonian graveyards. Biologia 2017, 72, 500–509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Tomović, G.; Randjelović, V.; Niketić, M.; Vukojičić, S.; Zlatković, B. New distribution data of some Pontic and submediterranean plant species in Serbia. Arch. Biol. Sci. 2003, 55, 45–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Kaźmierczakowa, R.; Towpasz, K. Ranunculus illyricus L.—Jaskier illiryjski. In Polish Red Data Book of Plants—Pteridophytes and Flowering Plants, 3rd ed.; Kaźmierczakowa, R., Zarzycki, K., Mirek, Z., Eds.; Polish Academy of Sciences, Institute of Nature Conservation: Cracow, Poland, 2014; pp. 196–197. (In Polish) [Google Scholar]
  17. Towpasz, K.; Cwener, A. Nowe stanowisko Ranunculus illyricus (Ranunculaceae) w Polsce. Fragmenta Floristica et Geobotanica Polonica 2002, 9, 370–372. [Google Scholar]
  18. Dembicz, J.; Kozub, Ł. Potwierdzenie występowania Ranunculus illyricus (Ranuncululaceae) w Skorocicach (Wyżyna Małopolska) (Confirmation of Ranunculus illyricus (Ranunculaceae) locality in Skorocice (Małopolska Upland)). Fragm. Florist. Geobot. Pol. 2015, 22, 381–384. [Google Scholar]
  19. PLADIAS. Database of the Czech Flora and Vegetation. Available online: www.pladias.cz (accessed on 10 March 2022).
  20. Mourad, M.M.; Hamed, K.A.; Al-Nowaihi, A.S. The morphology and anatomy of the achene in certain species of sub-family Ranunculoideae (Ranunculaceae) with special reference to the achene vasculature. Taeckholmia 2000, 20, 33–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Gherghişan, E. Research on blastogenesis process ex situ in some species of angiosperms in Macin Mountains National Park. J. Hortic. For. 2013, 17, 133–140. [Google Scholar]
  22. Aslam, M.S.; Choudhary, B.A.; Uzair, M.; Ijaz, A.S. The genus Ranunculus: A phytochemical and ethnopharmacological review. Int. J. Pharm. Pharm. Sci. 2012, 4, 15–22. [Google Scholar]
  23. Hachelaf, A.; Touil, A.; Zellagui, A.; Rhouati, S. Antioxidant and antibacterial activities of essential oil extracted from Ranunculus arvensis L. Der Pharma Chem. 2015, 7, 170–173. [Google Scholar]
  24. Kelemen, C.D.; Houdkova, M.; Urbanova, K.; Badarau, S.; Gurean, D.; Pamfil, D.; Kokoska, L. Chemical composition of the essential oils of aerial parts of Aconitum, Anemone and Ranunculus (Ranunculaceae) species from Romania. J. Essent. Oil-Bear. Plants 2019, 22, 728–745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Akbari, T.M. Bioecological and agrocultural properties of Ranunculus L. in the flora of Azerbaijan. Int. J. Curr. Res. Biosci. Plant. Biol. 2017, 4, 69–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Alexander, M.P. Diferential staining of aborted and nonaborted pollen. Stain Technol. 1969, 44, 117–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Godini, A. Counting pollen grains of some almond cultivars by means of anhaemocytometer. Rivista Di Ortoflorofrutticoltura Italiana 1981, 65, 173–178. [Google Scholar]
  28. Peters, J. Tetrazolium Testing Handbook: Contribution No. 29 to the Handbook on Seed Testing, Revised 2000; AOSA: Las Cruces, NM, USA, 2000. [Google Scholar]
  29. International Seed Testing Association (ISTA). International rules for seed testing. Seed Sci. Technol. 1999, 27, 1–333. [Google Scholar]
  30. Troll, W. Vergleichende Morphologie der Höheren Pflanzen; Verlag von Gebrüder Bortraeger: Berlin-Zehlendorf, Germany, 1943; pp. 2646–2652. [Google Scholar]
  31. Tutin, T.G.; Heywood, V.H.; Burges, N.A.; Valentine, D.H.; Walters, S.M.; Webb, D.A. Flora Europaea, 2nd ed.; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 1993; Volume 1, pp. 269–286. [Google Scholar]
  32. Kocot, D.; Sitek, E.; Nowak, B.; Kołton, A.; Stachurska-Swakoń, A.; Towpasz, K. The Effectiveness of the Sexual Reproduction in Selected Clonal and Nonclonal Species of the Genus Ranunculus. Biology 2022, 11, 85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Cursach, J.; Rita, J. Reproductive biology of Ranunculus weyleri (Ranunculaceae), a narrowly endemic plant from the Balearic Islands with disjunct populations. Flora Morphol. Distrib. Funct. Ecol. Plants 2012, 207, 726–735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Rita, J.; Cursach, J. Creating new populations of Apium bermejoi (Apiaceae), a critically endangered endemic plant on Menorca (Balearic Islands). An. Jard. Bot. Madr. 2013, 70, 27–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Leśniański, G.Z.; Szmalec, T. Stan Ochrony Gatunków Roślin w Polsce w Latach 2013–2018; Biuletyn Monitoringu Przyrody, Biblioteka Monitoringu Środowiska GIOŚ: Warszawa, Poland, 2021; Volume 23, pp. 1–155. [Google Scholar]
  36. Dembicz, I.; Moysiyenko, I.I.; Kozub, Ł.; Dengler, J.; Zakharova, M.; Sudnik-Wójcikowska, B. Steppe islands in a sea of fields: Where island biogeography meets the reality of a severely transformed landscape. J. Veg. Sci. 2021, 32, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Zhao, L.; Bachelier, J.B.; Chang, H.L.; Tian, X.H.; Ren, Y. Inflorescence and floral development in Ranunculus and three allied genera in Ranunculeae (Ranunculoideae, Ranunculaceae). Plant Syst. Evol. 2012, 298, 1057–1071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Linkies, A.; Leubner-Metzger, G. Beyond gibberellins and abscisic acid: How ethylene and jasmonates control seed germination. Plant Cell Rep. 2012, 31, 253–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Golmohammadzadeh, S.; Zaefarian, F.; Rezvani, M. Effects of some chemical factors, prechilling treatments and interactions on the seed dormancy-breaking of two Papaver species. Weed Biol. Manag. 2015, 15, 11–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Nowak, B.; Sitek, E.; Augustynowicz, J. Sourcing and Propagation of Pontechium maculatum for Horticulture and Species Restoration. Biology 2020, 9, 317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Sitek, E.; Nowak, B.; Fecowicz, M.; Gajewski, Z.; Dańda, P.; Kapała, K.; Kozik-Dąbek, B. Application of horticultural and tissue culture methods for ex situ conservation of endangered Primula farinosa L. Acta Soc. Bot. Pol. 2020, 89, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Karami, A.; Khosh-Khui, M. Presence of double dormancy in Wild Persian Buttercup (Ranunculus asiaticus L.). Int. J. Agric. Res. 2010, 2, 97–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Czarnecka, B. The dynamics of the population of a steppe perennial Senecio macrophyllus M. BIEB. during xerothermic grassland overgrowing. Acta Soc. Bot. Pol. 2009, 78, 247–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. James, J.J.; Svejcar, T.J.; Rinella, M.J. Demographic processes limiting seedling recruitment in arid grassland restoration. J. Appl. Ecol. 2011, 48, 961–969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Partzsch, M.; Faulhaber, M.; Meier, T. The effect of the dominant grass Festuca rupicola on the establishment of rare forbs in semi-dry grasslands. Folia Geobot. 2018, 53, 103–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Harper, J.L.; White, J. The demography of plants. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 1974, 5, 419–463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Beruto, M.; Rabaglio, M.; Viglione, S.; Van Labeke, M.C.; Dhooghe, E. Ranunculus. In Ornamental Crops. Handbook of Plant Breeding; Van Huylenbroeck, J., Ed.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2018; Volume 11, pp. 649–671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Frey, M.N.; Schmit, J.P. Early-Season Treatment of Fig Buttercup (Ranunculus ficaria). Invasive Plant Sci. Manag. 2017, 10, 191–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Eriksson, O. Seedling dynamics and life histories in clonal plants. Oikos 1989, 55, 231–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Pirożnikow, E. Life cycle of herbaceous plants in disturbed and undisturbed sites of oak-linden-hornbeam forest (Tilio-Carpinetum). Ekol. Pol. 1998, 46, 157–168. [Google Scholar]
  51. Kamenetsky, R.; Peterson, L.R.; Melville, L.H.; Machado, C.F.; Bewley, J.D. Seasonal adaptations of the tuberous roots of Ranunculus asiaticus to desiccation and resurrection by changes in cell structure and protein content. New Phytol. 2005, 166, 193–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Dhooghe, E.; Grunewald, W.; Reheul, D.; Goetghebeur, P.; Van Labeke, M.C. Floral characteristics and gametophyte development of Anemone coronaria L. and Ranunculus asiaticus L. (Ranunculaceae). Sci. Hortic. 2012, 138, 73–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Godefroid, S.; Rivière, S.; Waldren, S.; Boretos, N.; Eastwood, R.; Vanderborght, T. To what extent are threatened European plant species conserved in seed banks? Biol. Conserv. 2011, 144, 1494–1498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Coppi, A.; Lastrucci, L.; Carta, A.; Foggi, B. Analysis of genetic structure of Ranunculus baudotii in a Mediterranean wetland. Implications for selection of seeds and seedlings for conservation. Aquat. Bot. 2015, 126, 25–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Luijten, S.H.; Kéry, M.; Oostermeijer, J.G.B.; Den Nijs, H.(J.)C.M. Demographic consequences of inbreeding and outbreeding in Arnica montana: A field experiment. J. Ecol. 2002, 90, 593–603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Scobie, A.R.; Wilcock, C.C. Limited mate availability decreases reproductive success of fragmented populations of Linnaea borealis, a rare, clonal self-incompatible plant. Ann. Bot. 2009, 103, 835–846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Gavin-Smyth, N.; Kramer, A.T.; Urbina-Casanova, R.; Vitt, P.; Fant, J.B. Genetic rescue reduces mate limitation in a threatened, clonal, and self, clonal, and plant species. Restor. Ecol. 2021, 29, e13458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Kunz, M.; Buchanan, M.F.; Randall, J.L.; Wall, W.A.; Hohmann, M.G. Life cycle, vegetative propagation, and reintroduction of federally endangered rough-leaved loosestrife, Lysimachia asperulifolia. Castanea 2014, 79, 18–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Labelled Ranunculus illyricus specimens growing in the collection: (a) vegetative aboveground shoots (20 April 2019); (b) flowering (28 May 2019); (c) ripening of fruit and die-back of aboveground shoots (24 June 2019).
Figure 1. Labelled Ranunculus illyricus specimens growing in the collection: (a) vegetative aboveground shoots (20 April 2019); (b) flowering (28 May 2019); (c) ripening of fruit and die-back of aboveground shoots (24 June 2019).
Biology 11 00873 g001
Figure 2. Annual developmental cycle of Ranunculus illyricus: (a) dormant cluster of tubers, (bd) development of underground parts and (e) shoot with leaf after dormancy, (f) flowering plants, (gj) developmental stages of flower, (k) receptacle with achenes, (l) ripe fruits.
Figure 2. Annual developmental cycle of Ranunculus illyricus: (a) dormant cluster of tubers, (bd) development of underground parts and (e) shoot with leaf after dormancy, (f) flowering plants, (gj) developmental stages of flower, (k) receptacle with achenes, (l) ripe fruits.
Biology 11 00873 g002
Figure 3. Vegetatively reproducing individual of Ranunculus illyricus: (a) mother cluster of tubers with aboveground shoot, (b) underground stolons, (c) progeny clusters of tubers.
Figure 3. Vegetatively reproducing individual of Ranunculus illyricus: (a) mother cluster of tubers with aboveground shoot, (b) underground stolons, (c) progeny clusters of tubers.
Biology 11 00873 g003
Figure 4. Vegetative development of one Ranunculus illyricus clone during a three-year period. Example: 11–mother cluster planted in 2016 produced two progeny clusters in 2017 (11.1 and 11.2) and three in 2018 (11.0.1, 11.0.2 and 11.0.3). In 2018, individual 11.1 produced four progeny clusters of tubers (11.1.1–11.1.4).
Figure 4. Vegetative development of one Ranunculus illyricus clone during a three-year period. Example: 11–mother cluster planted in 2016 produced two progeny clusters in 2017 (11.1 and 11.2) and three in 2018 (11.0.1, 11.0.2 and 11.0.3). In 2018, individual 11.1 produced four progeny clusters of tubers (11.1.1–11.1.4).
Biology 11 00873 g004
Figure 5. Daytime temperatures during the growing season of R. illyricus (September–June) in the years 2015–2019.
Figure 5. Daytime temperatures during the growing season of R. illyricus (September–June) in the years 2015–2019.
Biology 11 00873 g005
Figure 6. Viability of pollen and seeds of Ranunculus illyricus, (a) pollen after Alexander staining: red pollen grains are viable; (b) seed after tetrazolium staining—living tissue is red. Scale bars: (a) 100 μm, (b) 1 mm.
Figure 6. Viability of pollen and seeds of Ranunculus illyricus, (a) pollen after Alexander staining: red pollen grains are viable; (b) seed after tetrazolium staining—living tissue is red. Scale bars: (a) 100 μm, (b) 1 mm.
Biology 11 00873 g006
Figure 7. Seed germination and seed-derived plant development of R. illyricus under ex situ conditions: (a) epigeic seed germination between 10–20 days after sowing, (b) seedlings with cotyledons before potting, (c) two-month-old seedling with dried cotyledons and juvenile leaves, (d) three-month-old seed-origin plants, (e) morphological structure of above- and belowground organs of a seed-origin plant at the end of the first growing season, (f) individual of generative origin with some tuberous roots at the end of the first growing season, (g) cluster of tubers after the first overwintering, (h) three-year-old plant obtained from seed (top) and its vegetative progeny (bottom) before winter. Scale bar = 1 cm.
Figure 7. Seed germination and seed-derived plant development of R. illyricus under ex situ conditions: (a) epigeic seed germination between 10–20 days after sowing, (b) seedlings with cotyledons before potting, (c) two-month-old seedling with dried cotyledons and juvenile leaves, (d) three-month-old seed-origin plants, (e) morphological structure of above- and belowground organs of a seed-origin plant at the end of the first growing season, (f) individual of generative origin with some tuberous roots at the end of the first growing season, (g) cluster of tubers after the first overwintering, (h) three-year-old plant obtained from seed (top) and its vegetative progeny (bottom) before winter. Scale bar = 1 cm.
Biology 11 00873 g007
Table 1. The fresh matter (FM) of tuber clusters, the number of tubers in one cluster, and number of progeny clusters (PC) for different age clusters in the years 2017–2019.
Table 1. The fresh matter (FM) of tuber clusters, the number of tubers in one cluster, and number of progeny clusters (PC) for different age clusters in the years 2017–2019.
Age of ClusterNumber of ClustersFM of Tuber Cluster
± SE [mg]
Number of Tubers in One Cluster ± SENumber of PC * Produced by One MC **
New377573.5 ± 16.9 b ***13.9 ± 0.21 aHave not produced PC yet
One year85682.3 ± 43.0 b22.1 ± 0.99 b2.23 b
Two years32392.3 ± 46.5 a16.5 ± 1.15 a1.78 a
Kruskal–Wallis and Dunn’s testKruskal–Wallis and Dunn’s testStudent t-test
* PC—progeny cluster, ** MC—mother cluster, *** a, b—values within a column followed by the same letter are not significantly different at p = 0.05.
Table 2. Effect of tuber cluster age on the number of flowers produced.
Table 2. Effect of tuber cluster age on the number of flowers produced.
Age of ClusterNumber of ClustersNumber of Flowers per Cluster ± SE
New0Have not flowered yet
One year2841.7 ± 0.08 b *
Two years1051.3 ± 0.13 a
Mann–Whitney U test
* a, b—values within a column followed by the same letter are not significantly different at p = 0.05.
Table 3. The size of tuber clusters and the reproduction mode for two age groups of clusters in the year 2018 and their effect on selected traits related to the efficiency of generative and vegetative propagation.
Table 3. The size of tuber clusters and the reproduction mode for two age groups of clusters in the year 2018 and their effect on selected traits related to the efficiency of generative and vegetative propagation.
Mode of Reproduction in 2018VG *VGVGVG
Assessed ParameterClusters
“New” 2017 (n = 64)“One-Year” 2017 (n = 31)
Number of tubers in cluster in 2017 16.0 a **15.0 a15.5 a26.9 a24.1 a26.2 a
Fresh matter of clusters in 2017 [mg]1020 ab700 a1100 b1740 a1150 a1010 a
“One-year” 2018“Two-year” 2018
Number of flowers in 2018 2.2 a×1.5 a1.7 a×1.4 a
Percentage of flowers setting fruits in 201879.1 a×50 a56.1 a×50 a
Height of flowering stem in 2018 [cm]30.4 a×19.9 a25.7 a×25.2 a
Number of tubers in clusters in 201826.7 b19.9 a×16.9 a14.7 a×
Fresh matter of clusters in 2018 [mg]850 b560 a×430 a300 a×
* VG—vegetatively and generatively, V—vegetatively, G—generatively ** a, b—values in rows for the same age followed by the same letter are not significantly different according to Kruskal–Wallis and Dunn’s test as well as Mann-Whitney U test and p = 0.05.
Table 4. Correlation matrix of mean temperatures and size of tuber cluster (its FM and number of tubers).
Table 4. Correlation matrix of mean temperatures and size of tuber cluster (its FM and number of tubers).
Mean Temperatures
MarchAprilMayJune
Number of tubers in clusterr = 0.2551
p = 0.000
r = −0.2560
p = 0.000
r = −0.2448
p = 0.000
r = 0.0016
p = 0.975
Fresh matter of clusterr = 0.4120
p = 0.000
r = −0.4624
p = 0.000
r = −0.3812
p = 0.000
r = −0.1722
p = 0.000
Table 5. The production and viability of pollen and efficiency of fruit setting of Ranunculus illyricus.
Table 5. The production and viability of pollen and efficiency of fruit setting of Ranunculus illyricus.
Year of EvaluationMean ± SETest
Number of pollen grains in one anther [pcs]20192106.3 ± 990.8-
Number of stamens in one flower [pcs]201966.3 ± 1.6-
Number of pollen grains in one flower [pcs]2019139,644 ± 69,822-
Viability of pollen grains [%]201761.8 ± 1.2 ab *ANOVA and Tukey test
p = 0.05
201868.5 ± 2.1 b
201953.6 ± 4.9 a
Number of pistils in one flower [pcs]2017138 ± 7.6 a ANOVA and Tukey test
p = 0.213
2018154.7 ± 8.3 a
2019148.0 ± 3.4 a
Number of achenes in one flower [pcs]201718.9 ± 3.0 bKruskal–Wallis and Dunn’s test
p = 0.0000
20186.0 ± 1.6 a
201913.3 ± 1.8 b
Effectiveness of fruit set [%]201712.8 ± 1.7 cKruskal–Wallis and Dunn’s test
p = 0.0000
20183.7 ± 0.9 a
20198.9 ± 1.1 b
* a, b, c—values within a column for one assessed feature followed by the same letter do not differ significantly.
Table 6. The effect of hot stratification and temperature on germination ability of Ranunculus illyricus seeds [% per plate ± SE].
Table 6. The effect of hot stratification and temperature on germination ability of Ranunculus illyricus seeds [% per plate ± SE].
Temperature of GerminationHot StratificationMeans for Temperature of Germination
Without Hot StratificationHot Stratification (50 °C)
20 ± 2 °C0.0 ± 0.0 a *0.0 ± 0.0 a0.0 ± 0.0 A
10 °C40.0 ± 8.1 c20.0 ± 8.1 b30.0 ± 6.5 B
Means for stratification20.0 ± 8.5 A10.0 ± 1.8 A
* a, b, c, A, A, B—values within columns and rows followed by the same letter do not differ significantly for p = 0.5 and Tukey test; two-way ANOVA was performed: one factor: hot stratification (upper case), second factor: temperature of germination (upper case italics), interaction: hot stratification × temperature of germination—lower case.
Table 7. The effects of cold stratification and gibberellin application on germination ability of Ranunculus illyricus seeds [% per plate ± SE].
Table 7. The effects of cold stratification and gibberellin application on germination ability of Ranunculus illyricus seeds [% per plate ± SE].
Application of GA3Cold StratificationMeans for GA3 Application
Without StratificationCold Stratification (4 °C)
−GA30.0 ± 0.0 a *15 ± 9.6 ab7.5 ± 6.9 A
+GA35.0 ± 5 a30 ± 12.9 b17.5 ± 11.25 A
Means for stratification2.5 ± 3.5 A22.5 ± 11.3 B
* a, b, A, B, A—values within columns and rows followed by the same letter do not differ significantly for p = 0.5 and Tukey test; two-way ANOVA was performed: one factor: cold stratification (upper case), second factor: GA3 application (upper case italics), interaction: cold stratification × GA3 application—lower case.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kocot, D.; Sitek, E.; Nowak, B.; Kołton, A.; Towpasz, K. Reproductive Biology of Dry Grassland Specialist Ranunculus illyricus L. and Its Implications for Conservation. Biology 2022, 11, 873. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology11060873

AMA Style

Kocot D, Sitek E, Nowak B, Kołton A, Towpasz K. Reproductive Biology of Dry Grassland Specialist Ranunculus illyricus L. and Its Implications for Conservation. Biology. 2022; 11(6):873. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology11060873

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kocot, Dawid, Ewa Sitek, Barbara Nowak, Anna Kołton, and Krystyna Towpasz. 2022. "Reproductive Biology of Dry Grassland Specialist Ranunculus illyricus L. and Its Implications for Conservation" Biology 11, no. 6: 873. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology11060873

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop