Skip to main content
Log in

Rosetted siblings in F2 of a cross in pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) can be useful model for rosetting investigations

  • Published:
Euphytica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Environmentally and developmentally controlled rosette formation is welldocumented in certain crop species. But this report describes a geneticallyinduced rosetting observed in pomegranate (Punica granatum L.).Rosette genotypes were detected at a frequency of 0.12 in the F2 familiesof cv. Ganesh and a recessive rosette mutant clone of cv. Kabul Yellow. Therosetted seedlings had leaves almost touching the ground at emergence, whichwere closely set on a thick, compressed stem with narrow inter-nodes andinactive subapical meristem. They were similar in some certain respects tothe naturally occurring rosetting noticed in lettuce, spinach and lisianthus.The occurrence of rosette type was attributed to a recessive mutant gene ofKabul Yellow and was ascribed the gene symbol rg (rosette growth) whichwas found to alter a host of morphological traits in rosette siblings innursery and field. The foliage colour, pink of Ganesh and yellow of KabulYellow, served as visual marker in distinguishing segregating progeny intopink/yellow normal and rosette types in the nursery. A monogenic segregationin F2 for pink and yellow was evident both in normal and rosette siblings.When a single gene mutation for rosetting was considered a large portion ofthe rosette progeny in F2 was found missing. This has been explained on thebasis of two conditional lethal genes operating in rosette individuals.Moreover, the F2 and BC1 seeds had very low seed fertility indicatingthat F1 possibly carried heavy load of lethal genes. On transplantation,the rosette mutants started to grow tall and erect, like spinach, but had acompact habit with restricted branching and exhibited early leaf senescence,leaving a crown of bushy growth at the tip of almost naked, brittle shoots.Rosettes differed significantly from normal siblings for all the morphologicalcharacteristics studied. The normal progenies flowered and set fruits within13 months, the rosette ones almost failed to do so even after growing for 38months, although they showed relatively loose rosetting than in the nursery.However, one seedling produced 3 small flowers with rudimentary ovary.Moreover, it was observed that the rosette plants had a tendency to regressto normal state, since 9 out of the 31 rosette progeny produced axilary shootsthat had normal stem and leaf attributes. The individuals with both normal androsette shoots should serve the same purpose in research work, as do perfect isogeniclines. Based on the frequency at which the normal shoots appeared the role ofcryptic transposable elements (TEs) was suspected rather than back mutation.Rosette siblings with altered morphology reported here can be secured inabundant number along with the contrasting normal siblings by raising theF2, which provide a good opportunity to gain an insight in the control ofvarious plant developmental processes. Besides, it can be viewed as a valuablemodel system for fundamental research on physiological, biochemical andmolecular genetical bases of rosetting in crop plants.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Burr, B. & F.A. Burr, 1981. Transposable elements and genetic instability in crop plants. Stadler Symp 13: 115-118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buckley, B., J.N. Moore & J.R. Clark, 1995. Blackberry cultivars differ in susceptibility to rosette disease. Fruit Varieties J 49(4): 235-238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chun C.D., J.P. Kim & B. Hark, 1999. Effects of pruning, pinching and chilling treatment on flower malformation and rosette formation of Gypsophila paniculata. J. of the Korean Society for Horticultural Science 40(4): 470-476 (in Korean).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobzhansky, T., 1946. Genetics of natural populations XIII. Recombination and variability in Drosophila pseudoobscura. Genetics 31: 269.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferradini, N., M. Effati & A. Standardi, 1997. In vitro propagation of some Rubus genotypes. Italus Hortus 4(1): 3-8 (in Italian).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitter, A.H. & R.K.M. Hay, 1981. Environmental physiology of plants. Academic Press Inc, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gowda, M.V.C., H.L. Nadaf & R. Sheshgiri, 1996. The role of mutations in interspecific differentiation of groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.). Euphytica 90: 105-113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harbaugh, B.K. & J.W. Scott, 1996. 'Maurine Blue' Lisianthus (Eustoma grandiflorum Raf. Shinn). Hort Sci 31: 1055-1056.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardon, E., 1955. Letalfaktoren in ihrer Bedeutung fur Erbpathologie und Genphy-siologie der Entwicklung. Thieme/Stuttgart.

  • Hisamatsu, T., 2001. Studies on the role of gibberellin biosynthesis in the control of growth and development in Matthiola incana (L.) R. Br. and Eustoma grandiflorum (Raf.) Shinn. Bulletin of the National Research Institute of Vegetables, Ornamental Plants and Tea 16: 79-133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horst, K.K., 1979. Westcott's plant diseases handbook. Van Nostrand Reinhold Co, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jalikop, S.H. & P. Sampath Kumar, 1990. Use of a gene marker to study the mode of pollination in pomegranate (Punica granatum L.). J of Hort Sci 65: 221-223.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jalikop, S.H. & P. Sampath Kumar, 1998. Use of soft, semi-softand hard-seeded types of pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) for improvement of fruit attributes. Ind J Agric Sci 68: 87-91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, H.H., C. Chun, T. Kozai & J. Fuse, 2000. The potential use of photoperiod during transplant production under artificial lighting conditions on floral development and bolting, using spinach as a model. Hort Sci 35: 43-45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin, G.M., 1994. Pomegranate (Punica granatum) plant genetic resources in Turkmenistan. Plant Gen Res Newsletter 97: 31-36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewin, B., 1987. Genes. John Wiley and Sons Inc, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindqvist, K., 1960. Inheritance studies in lettuce. Heriditas 46: 387-470.

    Google Scholar 

  • McClintock, B., 1978. Mechanisms that rapidly recognize the genome. Stadler Symp 10: 25-47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Metzger, J.D. & J.A.A. Zeevaart, 1980. The effect of photoperiod on the levels of endogenous gibberellins in spinach as measured by combined gas chromatography-selected in current monitoring. Plant Physiol 66: 844-846.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nath, N. & G.S. Randhawa, 1959. Classification and description of some varieties of Punica grantum L. Ind J Hort 16: 191-201.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niemirowicz S.K., M. Rucinska & A. Korzeniewska, 1996. An induced mutation in cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.): super compact. Report Cucurbit Genetics Cooperative 19: 1-3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ohkawa, K., A. Kano, K. Kanematsu & M. Korenaga, 1991. Effects of air temperature and time on rosette formation in seedlings of Eustoma grandiflorum (Raf.) Shinn. Sci Hort 48: 171-176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ohkawa, K., M. Korenaga & T. Yoshizumi, 1993. Influence of temperature prior to seed ripening and at germination on rosette formation and bolting of Eustoma grandiflorum. Sci Hort 53: 225-230.

    Google Scholar 

  • Onisei, T., D. Amariei & E.T. Toth, 1996. Phenotypic variability of Digitalis purpurea L. 'in vitro' regenerated plants. Mededelingen aculteit Landbouwkundige en Toegepaste Biologische Wetenschappen, Universiteit-Gent 61: 151-155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raman, V.S., G. Manimekalai & S.R. Sreerangswamy, 1971. Chromosome behavior at meiosis in Punica granatum L. Cytologia 36: 400-404.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sansavini, S., C. Buscaroli & R. Stainer, 1999. Instability in mutants of apple cv. Gala Rivista di. Frutticoltura e di Ortofloricoltura 61: 63-72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandoval, F.J.A., 1998. Evaluation of gibberellic acid (GA3) to stimulate growth of rosette banana plants. Observations of its effect on fruit development. Corbana 23: 77-84 (in Spanish).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sears, E.R. & Okamoto, 1958. Intergenomic chromosome relationships in hexaploid wheat. Proc Xth Int Congr Genet 2: 258-259.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silva E.C., W.R. Maluf, N.R. Leal & L.A.A. Gomes, 1999. Inheritance of bolting tendency in lettuce Lactuca sativa L. Euphytica 109: 1-7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stansfield, W.D. 1986. Genetics. Mc Graw-Hill, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strickberger, M.W., 1968. Genetics. The Macmillan Company, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sturtevant, A.H., 1956. A highly specific complementary lethal system in Drsophila melanogaster. Genetica 41: 118-123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swietlik, D., 1989. Zinc stress on citrus. J Rio Grande Valley Hort Soc 42: 87-95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swietlik, D., 1999. Zinc nutrition in horticulture crops. In: J. Janick (Ed.), Hort Rev 23: pp. 109-178. John Wiley and Sons, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Symons, G.M., I.C. Murfet, J.J. Ross, L.J. Sherriff & T.D. Warkentin, 1999. Bushy, a dominant pea mutant characterized by short, thin stems, tiny leaves and a major reduction in apical dominance. Physiol Plantarum 107: 346-352.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tanimoto, E. & J. MacMillan, 1991. Gibberellin requirement for the normal growth of roots. In: N. Takahashi & B.O. Phinney (Eds.), Gibberellins. pp. 229-240. Springer Verlag, Berlin, Germany.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van der Pahlen, A. & J. Crnko, 1965. El virus del mosaico del alechuga (Marmor lactua Holmes) en Mendoza y Buenos Aires Rev Invest Agropec Ser 2: 25-31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vaidya, K.R. & M.M. Young, 1993. Ethyl methanesulfonate induced variation in qualitative and quantitative characters of roselle (Hibiscus sabdariffa L.) (Malvaceae). Revista Brasileira de Genetica 16: 381-391 (in Portuguese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wessler, S.R., 1988. Phenotypic diversity mediated by the transposable elements. Ac and SPm Sci 249: 399-405.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkins, M.B., 1974. The physiology of plant growth and development. McGraw-Hill, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • YaLi, M. & Z.Z. Guo, 1996. Studies on growing characteristics of intercropping cabbage with wheat. China Vegetables 5: 15-17 (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang Ming, Hu Yi, M. Lodhi, Mc Combie, W.R. Ma Hong, 1999. The Arabidopsis, SKP-1-LIKE1 gene is essential for male meiosis and may control homologous separation. Proc of Nat Acad of Sci USA 96: 11416-11421.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yoshida, T., 1994. Dwarfism in trifoliate orange (Poncirus trifoliata Raf.), its inheritance and interaction with GA3. J Jpn Soc Hort Sci 63(1): 23-30 (in Japanese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeevaart, J.A.D., 1971. Effects of photoperiod on growth rate and endogenous gibberellins in the long-day rosette plant-spinach. Plant Physiol 47: 821-827.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jalikop, S. Rosetted siblings in F2 of a cross in pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) can be useful model for rosetting investigations. Euphytica 131, 333–342 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024007429088

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024007429088

Navigation