An Evidence-Based Approach To Male Urogenital Emergencies

Table of Contents

 

Abstract

Acute scrotal or penile pain can cause a high level of anxiety for the patient, parent, and even, at times, for the health care provider. Presentations are often delayed as a result of the patient's embarrassment, and the patient may not be initially forthright with the exact nature of the complaint. The care provider must be sensitive to both the emotional and physical needs of the patient.

The challenge in emergency practice is to differentiate conditions requiring prompt evaluation and action from urgent conditions that are amenable to outpatient management. Missed or delayed diagnosis of testicular torsion threatens testicular viability and future fertility. Similarly, early identification and aggressive management of necrotizing fasciitis of the perineum (Fournier's disease or Fournier's gangrene) is critical to maximizing outcomes. Emergent penile conditions include priapism and paraphimosis. Any form of GU trauma is presumed to be an emergency until proven otherwise.

The goal of this issue of Emergency Medicine Practice is to provide a risk management tool and to provide an evidence-based best practice approach to the male complaining of acute scrotal or penile pain.

Practice Recommendations (key points from the issue)

Click here to download a PDF of the Evidence-Based Practice Recommendations for this issue.

Case PresentationS

Critical Appraisal Of The Literature

One of the inherent difficulties in formulating an evidence-based approach to male GU emergencies is the paucity of available literature that is actually useful in "real-time" to the emergency clinician. For example, literature attempting to answer the age-old debate of "boxer briefs" versus "tighty-whities" is just not that helpful to the emergency practitioner at 3 o'clock in the morning!² Therefore, it is necessary to rely on weak studies (retrospective studies, case series, case reports) to guide us in our clinical decision-making.

Etiology and Pathophysiology

The male genitalia is composed of the penis (paired erectile bodies and penile urethra) and the scrotum (encases the testis, epididymis and spermatic cord bilaterally). (See Figure 1.) The scrotal wall consists of several layers all deep to the epidermis, many of which are contiguous with the penis, perirectal region, and anterior abdominal wall. Each testis is encapsulated with a dense connective tissue layer termed the tunica albuginea. External to the tunica albuginea is the tunica vaginalis, which envelops each testicle and fastens it to the posterior scrotal wall. A lack of firm testicular attachment by the tunica vaginalis subjects it to potential horizontal or vertical rotation around or within the spermatic cord, resulting in testicular torsion. The appendix testes are embryologic remnants with no known physiologic function located at the uppermost pole of the testes. These appendages are prone to torsion as well, leading to localized, self-limited necrosis. The epididymis adheres closely to the posterolateral aspect of each testis, and it is responsible for promoting sperm maturation and motility. Similar to the appendix testis, the appendix epididymis is an embryologic remnant attached to the head of each epididymis and frequently is involved in self-limiting torsion that can simulate testicular torsion. The penis consists of the 2 corpora cavernosa (erectile bodies, each encapsulated by tunica albuginea) and the solitary corpus spongiosum, which surrounds the penile urethra. In uncircumcised males, the retractile penile foreskin (prepuce) is a sleeve that normally covers the head of the penis (glans). The potential constricting effect of a proximally retracted foreskin may lead to paraphimosis. Priapism is a pathologic condition defined by the presence of a persistent erection lasting longer than about 4 hours in the absence of any sexual desire or stimulation. It most frequently results from engorgement of the corpora cavernosa with stagnant blood (termed low-flow priapism). Although rare, high-flow priapism results from the development of a traumatic arterial-cavernosal fistulae, resulting in the accumulation of oxygen-rich blood in the corpora.

In the male presenting with GU pain, it is essential to delineate the precise anatomic regions where the pain is located. Pain may be due to structures within or adjoining a particular region or may be referred from adjacent areas. The majority of patients complaining of acute scrotal (or penile) pain will have a problem isolated to the genitalia. However, it is equally important to consider the etiologies of referred pain, including retroperitoneal processes such as renal colic, pyelonephritis, or abdominal aortic aneurysm.

Differential Diagnoses

GU complaints are broadly categorized into those involving the scrotum and the structures that it envelops (testicle, epididymis, and spermatic cord) or those involving the penis. Child abuse must be considered in the differential diagnosis for any pediatric patient presenting with GU complaints. The American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) has published guidelines regarding the evaluation of sexual abuse in children.³

Acute Scrotal Pain

There are a wide variety of clinical conditions that present as an acute, painful, swollen, tender hemiscrotum, see Table 1.

Distinguishing exact causes can be particularly challenging in children, who are most likely to present with an undifferentiated "acute scrotum." Fortunately, in the vast majority of cases, the "acute scrotum" can be attributed to 1 of 3 diagnostic entities: testicular torsion, epididymitis, or appendage torsion. (See Table 2). This fact serves to better focus the ED evaluation. The frequency of each diagnosis varies significantly from study to study (depending on factors such as the age distribution of the population studied), making it difficult to draw firm conclusions from the data.^{5, 6} Having said this, each contributes to roughly one-third of pediatric "acute scrotum" cases.⁷ In a review of 238 consecutive cases presenting to a children's hospital ED, incidences of testicular torsion, appendage torsion, and epididymitis were 16%, 46%, and 35%, respectively.⁸ Similar to other studies, the predominant diagnosis varied by age group: testicular torsion in the first year of life, appendage torsion in the toddler to pre-pubertal (3-13 year old) range, and epididymitis after 13 years of age. Specifically, bimodal peaks in the incidence of testicular torsion were noted in newborns as well as peri-pubertal males, which is concordant with other investigations.^9,10 In addition, up to 10% to 20% of cases may result from other causes entirely (such as incarcerated inguinal hernia or idiopathic scrotal edema,¹¹ among others).

Fournier's disease should be considered in elderly, diabetic, or other immuno-compromised males complaining of perineal pain "out of proportion" to physical findings. Although Fournier's is typically thought of as an "elderly male" disease, it has also been reported in children (as well as females). ¹² Interestingly, in contrast to adults, children with Fournier's disease may appear relatively non-toxic despite marked tissue inflammation and necrosis.¹³

Acute Penile Pain

Patients with penile complaints often present non-specifically, complaining of a "painful" or "swollen" penis. When penile swelling is the complaint, localized edema must be distinguished from that caused by a systemic derangement (ie, nephrotic syndrome or heart failure). Localized processes include constriction (ie, paraphimosis, entrapment injury), inflammation (ie, balanoposthitis), infection (ie, "bite" injury),^14,15 or other trauma (ie, abrasion, contusion, burn).

Patients with problems localized to the penis are often readily distinguished from those presenting with an acute scrotum by history and findings on physical examination alone. Indeed, the etiology of acute penile pain, although not straightforward, is usually more apparent when compared with an "acute scrotum." (See Table 3.) Emergent penile conditions include priapism and paraphimosis (or entrapment injuries that mimic paraphimosis). Priapism is readily distinguishable by the presence of a persistent erection. Paraphimosis, on the other hand, must be differentiated from other conditions resulting in pain or edema of the distal penis. Balanitis and posthitis are defined as inflammation of the glans or prepuce, respectively, and typically result from inflammation (ie, local irritation) with or without coexisting bacterial (ie, Streptococcal or Staphylococcal species) or fungal (ie, Candida) infection. Phimosis is the inability to retract the penile foreskin proximally. This is typically a chronic condition, which may rarely present acutely to the ED as urinary retention when a patient is unable to void spontaneously as a result of distal foreskin obstruction caused by the chronic inflammatory process.^16,17

Genitourinary Trauma

Traumatic injury must be included in the differential of any GU complaint, whether localized to the scrotum (and its contents), the penis, or to surrounding perineal structures. (See Table 4.) Importantly, trauma-induced testicular torsion has been reported.¹⁸ As such, consideration of testicular torsion in the differential of blunt scrotal trauma is prudent.¹⁹

Sexually Transmitted Disease

Genital infections that are likely to cause acute symptoms can be divided into diseases characterized by genital ulceration and diseases causing penile discharge (urethritis). (See Table 5.) Among the many infections that can cause genital ulceration, genital herpes, syphilis, and chancroid are most commonly seen in the United States, with genital herpes being most prevalent. Urethritis is typically characterized by discharge of mucopurulent or purulent material, with or without accompanying dysuria or urethral pruritis. The principal bacterial pathogens of proven clinical importance in men with urethritis are Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Chlamydia trachomatis. However, asymptomatic infections are common as well. In select populations, it is the author's experience that urethral trauma from compulsively stripping the urethra in search of purulent discharge is a potential cause of dysuria in sexually active men. The diagnosis is based soley on a thorough history by a suspicious physician.

Prehospital Care

Not surprisingly, there remains a paucity of data regarding the management of male GU conditions in the prehospital setting. With this in mind, it appears plausible to focus on symptom relief, typically with narcotic analgesics and antiemetic agents. In addition, administration of intravenous fluids (as well as maintenance of "NPO" status) is prudent for any conditions that may require procedural sedation or surgical intervention following ED arrival.

ED Evaluation

A diligent history and physical examination of the patient complaining of acute scrotal or penile symptoms is the cornerstone of formulating an appropriate plan of action. Such complaints will often be shadowed by a component of patient embarrassment and apprehension; this is especially true in adolescents. Care must be taken to respect and address privacy issues in the adolescent and prepubescent age groups. Similarly, parents may in some cases be uncomfortable discussing their child's problem. This may hold true for caretakers of adult patients as well. A useful approach to facilitating a more comprehensive history and examination is to offer to first interview, examine, and discuss with the patient alone and then speak with all parties in concert.

The Acute Scrotum: Important Historical Questions

Scrotal pain that begins abruptly and severely is testicular torsion until proven otherwise. The sudden twisting of the spermatic cord, characteristic of testicular torsion, leads to rapid diminution of blood supply to the affected testicle that causes "ischemic" pain. This is in contrast to the more indolent and smoldering pain of epididymitis, which is a gradually progressive inflammatory (rather than ischemic) process. Indeed, the pain of testicular torsion (or appendage torsion) often develops over seconds or minutes, whereas the pain associated with epididymitis frequently develops over the course of hours or days.

The distinction between constant/progressive and intermittent/colicky pain is very useful in the diagnosis of acute scrotal pain. Constant and progressive pain typically results from progressive inflammatory processes, such as epididymitis. Patients may exhibit pain with ambulation or movement resulting from the inflammation. Intermittent and colicky pain is more consistent with rapid "onset" and "offset" conditions, as occurs in testicular torsion. Pain may be intermittent, as the spermatic cord may torse and detorse spontaneously.

It is critical to ask about "systemic" findings in the patient presenting with an acute scrotum. As a general rule, patients with testicular torsion are more ill-appearing (with associated systemic symptoms such as nausea and vomiting) than patients with the other common etiologies of acute scrotal pain (epididymitis or appendage torsion).^20,21 While patients with epididymitis may present with nausea, malaise, or low grade fever, it is typically those with more advanced degrees of infection (epididymo orchitis) whom exhibit more "systemic" involvement. It is common for patients with acute scrotal pain to complain of low abdominal, proximal lower extremity (ie, inner thigh, groin, inguinal), or back/flank pain. Likewise, it is important to consider acute GU pathology in any male patient presenting with seemingly isolated pain to the aforementioned anatomic regions. For instance, always consider GU conditions in the differential for any male with a presenting complaint of abdominal, inguinal, or flank pain.

Always inquire about changes in urination, including urgency, frequency, dysuria, hesitancy, and hematuria. Urinary symptoms may accompany many causes of acute scrotal pain. Classically, epididymitis may be accompanied by urinary complaints such as dysuria and urgency.

The Acute Scrotum: Important Physical Findings

When examining a patient with acute scrotal complaints, their general appearance provides important diagnostic clues. Patients with "intermittent and colicky" pain (ie, testicular torsion or renal colic) tend to writhe on the gurney or pace about the examination room as they cannot find a position of comfort. In contrast, patients with progressive inflammatory conditions (such as epididymitis or epididymo-orchitis) tend to minimize activity, as the slightest degree of movement may exacerbate their pain, while rest and elevation bring relief.

A complete abdominal examination is crucial in any patient presenting with an acute scrotum, as many intra-abdominal conditions may present with a component of GU pain. It is important to examine the male genitalia both while the patient is standing and lying supine. Exercise caution when examining a standing patient as some males may experience a strong vagal response to scrotal (or prostate) stimulation, leading to pre-syncope or syncope. Also, examination of the testicle and epididymis may cause significant discomfort even in the absence of pathology. Always examine the unaffected side first since many patients will have unilateral localization of pain. This serves as a control and will help in gaining patient confidence and trust (which may rapidly wane after examination of a swollen and painful scrotum). Key visual features of testicular torsion include a high riding testicle with a transverse lie, both resulting from twisting of the spermatic cord. (See Figure 2.) Unfortunately, such "textbook" presentations rarely, if ever, occur in clinical practice. More commonly, patients with acute scrotal pain, regardless of the underlying etiology, present identically: with a diffusely painful, swollen, tender hemiscrotum.

As mentioned, differentiating among the etiologies of acute scrotal pain is challenging. Often confounding the problem is the exquisite pain and discomfort elicited by examination itself. However, there are some findings which, if present, may facilitate a more accurate diagnosis.²²

If isolated swelling and tenderness of the epididymis is present, epididymitis is the likely diagnosis. The natural progression is to initially affect only the epididymis and then progress to the ipsilateral testicle as well (epididymo-orchitis).

The presence of an intact ipsilateral cremasteric reflex is reportedly highly sensitive for excluding the diagnosis of testicular torsion.^23,24 The reflex is elicited by stroking the ipsilateral inner thigh with a tongue depressor or gloved hand (see Figure 3), resulting in elevation of the testicle through contraction of the cremasteric muscle. Although the presence of an intact cremasteric reflex is useful in ruling-out torsion, it is a soft finding as the absence of this reflex is non-specific, and some healthy individuals lack the reflex altogether (particularly males in their first few years of life).²⁵ Importantly, there have been several published reports of testicular torsion presenting with an intact cremasteric reflex.^26,27,28

Prehn's sign, or relief of pain with scrotal elevation, was previously thought to help in differentiating epididymitis (inflammatory pain relief with scrotal elevation) from testicular torsion (no change in ischemic pain with elevation).²⁹ However, this sign is generally considered unreliable in distinguishing these 2 disorders (although a specific reference to its sensitivity and specificity remains elusive after much searching).³⁰ Therefore, its use for this purpose is additive but not diagnostic.

Isolated nodularity at the superior pole of either the testicle or epididymis is often the result of appendage torsion, given the anatomic location of these vestigial structures. The blue dot sign is pathognomonic for appendage torsion.³¹ As appendage torsion is most common in the prepubescent age group, visualization of the infarcted appendage (the "blue dot") may be seen through thin, non-hormonally stimulated prepubertal skin. This finding is very specific, yet insensitive.

Scrotal transillumination may be helpful in cases of suspected hydrocele. The scrotal fluid will supposedly transilluminate when a light is shined against the posterior scrotal wall. However, practitioners whom seldom utilize this technique tend to "overcall" positive test results (ie, every scrotum transilluminates), so results should be cautiously interpreted in the context of the overall clinical picture.³²

Priapism

Patients with low-flow priapism often complain of a prolonged and exquisitely painful erection. Stagnant, oxygen-poor, acidic blood accumulates in the corpora, resulting in "ischemic" pain. Ischemia resulting from prolonged erection may lead to irreversible cellular damage, permanent fibrosis, and impotence. Several common etiologies of low-flow priapism are listed in Table 6. Of important note, use of oral erectile dysfunction treatments such as sildenafil has only rarely been associated with priapism. ³³ Patients with high-flow priapism often complain of a persistent, yet painless, erection. In this condition, there is continuous inflow of oxygen-rich blood through traumatic arterial-cavernosal fistulae.

Paraphimosis

Paraphimosis classically develops in uncircumcised males when the proximally retracted tight foreskin acts as a constricting band on the distal portion of the penile shaft. Initial disruption of venous drainage by the constricting foreskin leads to a cycle of progressive glans edema followed by arterial compromise with subsequent glans necrosis and gangrene. The penile foreskin should always be replaced (reduced) after retraction for examination or urethral catheter placement to prevent iatrogenic paraphimosis. Glans edema mimicking paraphimosis can occur in circumcised or uncircumcised males in the case of penile entrapment injury. External objects may constrict the mid to distal shaft leading to the same pathophysiologic derangements as seen with paraphimosis. These objects may be placed intentionally for sexual stimulation (ie, string, metal rings, or rubber rings) or may occur accidentally, as in the case of a hair tourniquet in male infants.³⁴ Hair tourniquets may be particularly difficult to diagnose, as the offending hair may be nearly invisible within a ring of edema fluid or edematous coronal sulcus of the glans penis. An occult hair tourniquet should be considered (along with testicular torsion) in the infant with inconsolable crying.

Genitourinary Trauma

Trauma to the GU system may be either blunt or penetrating in nature. Although a detailed discussion is beyond the scope of this article, several pertinent points deserve mention.

Scrotum Trauma

Significant trauma to the scrotum and its associated structures (testicle, epididymis, and spermatic cord) occurs infrequently with minor blunt force mechanisms owing to both testicular mobility (ie, testes can "roll with the punches") and the protective cremasteric reflex. In addition, each testicle is encapsulated by its fibrous tunica albuginea, which may protect the testicular parenchyma from injury. Blunt force injury may cause a testicular contusion or, less frequently, rupture of the tunica albuginea (testicular rupture). Also, traumatic dislocation of the testicle to an aberrant location outside of the scrotal confines is possible with significant blunt force trauma. All but the most superficial penetrating scrotal injuries will require specialty consultation for possible exploration.³⁵ Patients with either blunt or penetrating GU trauma may present with a hematocele, which is a painful, tender, ecchymotic scrotal mass resulting from the accumulation of blood within the tunica vaginalis.

Penis Trauma

Trauma to the penis often presents with a distressing component of pain. A penile fracture results from an acute tear or rupture of the tunica albuginea of the corpus cavernosum. Patients often relate a history of a sudden "snapping" sound during intercourse or other sexual activity or as a result of blunt trauma in the setting of an erect penis. Physical examination reveals a swollen, ecchymotic, detumescent (limp) penis that is tender to palpation.³⁶ A penile contusion results from less severe direct blunt force trauma to a typically detumescent penis. In a penile contusion, the tunica albuginea remains intact, and the patient presents with localized ecchymoses and tenderness at the site of trauma. This may result from a toilet seat injury sustained while toilet training in the toddler/pre-school age groups or as a result of a "straddle" injury in any age group. Penetrating penile injuries necessitate specialty consultation in all cases.

Sexually Transmitted Disease

Genital Ulceration

Genital herpes (either primary or recurrent) may present with severe pain, pruritis, or burning localized to the penis, scrotum, rectum, or elsewhere in the perineum. However, the typical pattern of multiple grouped vesicular (or ulcerative) lesions may be absent entirely in many acutely infected persons, rendering the diagnosis elusive. Definitive diagnosis of any ulcerative condition based on history and physical examination alone is frequently inaccurate.³⁷

Urethritis

Any patient presenting to the ED with a complaint of penile discharge should be assumed to have urethritis. However, the distinction between urethritis with or without accompanying epididymitis is critical in the male presenting with penile discharge, as it has important management implications. When accompanying epididymal pain or tenderness is present, both the dosage and duration of antimicrobial treatment increase, as epididymitis represents a more advanced infection.

Although testing to determine the specific etiology in cases of STD (whether ulcerative or urethritis) is recommended, this is often impractical in the busy ED setting, given the difficulties in ensuring timely follow-up counseling and treatment for abnormal test results. Therefore, empiric antimicrobial treatment for likely pathogens should be initiated, and counseling regarding notification of sexual contacts should be underscored.

Diagnostic Studies

The key to managing acute GU problems is the timely recognition of fertility and testicular viability threatening conditions. Most routine diagnostic aids (such as blood work and urinalysis) add little to distinguish among the common etiologies of acute scrotal pain. Instead, they detract from patient outcome by causing delays in diagnosis, referred to by some as "castration through procrastination." If the history and examination suggests the diagnosis of testicular torsion, urology (or pediatric surgery) consultation and plans for immediate surgical exploration should be initiated without delay. A patient of appropriate age (neonate, adolescent) with classic findings of testicular torsion does not require any diagnostic tests. Indeed, testicular salvage rates are time sensitive. A meta-analysis of 1140 patients in 22 series demonstrated a greater than 90% salvage rate with surgery within 6 hours of pain onset. Likewise, the risk of subsequent testicular atrophy increased (despite surgical detorsion) beyond this 6 hour window. (See Figure 4).³⁸ However, with less distinct ("indeterminate") circumstances, a confirmatory diagnostic study (typically color Doppler ultrasound) is indicated.³⁹ In fact, although surgical exploration is the initial treatment of choice with a strong clinical suspicion for testicular torsion, guidelines published by the American College of Radiology state that confirmatory imaging can be performed if readily available and performed within 30 to 60 minutes of the request to simultaneously prepare the operating room.⁴⁰

The diagnosis of priapism and paraphimosis are made solely on clinical grounds. In cases of GU trauma, a sonogram can be very useful in delineating the extent of injury and for assessing distal penile vascular integrity. STD's may require additional confirmatory microbiologic laboratory testing, including direct culture or other automated techniques such as polymerase chain reaction testing, none of which are practical in the ED setting because of the difficulties with ensuring follow-up on abnormal test results.

Radiologic Testing

When utilized in the appropriate clinical setting, sonography remains the most useful diagnostic modality in the evaluation of GU complaints. A color flow duplex Doppler ultrasound may be very helpful in indeterminate cases of acute scrotal pain. The classic sonographic finding suggestive of testicular torsion is diminished intratesticular blood flow. In addition, examination of the spermatic cord itself with high-resolution gray-scale sonography may reveal "coiling" or "kinking" of the cord at the site of torsion (see ‘Controversies/Cutting Edge’ section).⁴¹ Sonography is used not only to exclude testicular torsion but also to search for alternative causes of acute scrotal pain.⁴² In epididymitis, perfusion will be normal (or increased) due to the effects of inflammatory mediators on local vascular beds.⁴³ An infarcted appendage (resulting from appendage torsion) may be visualized on ultrasound as well.⁴⁴ Ultrasonography may also identify hydroceles, hematoceles, varicoceles, hernias, tumors, abscesses or gonadal vasculitis. Finally, ultrasound is an invaluable tool in the evaluation of GU trauma.^45,46 At least one recent study suggests that emergency physicians may be able to accurately diagnose patients presenting with acute scrotal pain using bedside sonography.⁴⁷

Radionuclide scintigraphy and color Doppler sonography show similar sensitivity as well as false negative rates for the diagnosis of testicular torsion. ⁴⁸ However, given the widespread availability and expertise with ultrasound technology and the inherent risks associated with radiation exposure, radionuclide procedures have fallen out of favor at many centers. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has been explored as well.^49,50 However, major limitations include availability and the amount of time required for adequate imaging. Computed tomography (CT) may be helpful in assessing the degree of extension in cases of GU infection (abscess, Fournier's disease), or in the search for coexisting injuries in the evaluation of GU trauma.⁵¹ In cases of Fournier's disease, delays in recognition and definitive surgical debridement can be life threatening, so imaging should not delay surgical consultation.

Treatment

Pain Relief

Antimicrobials

Antimicrobial agents are indicated in cases of suspected or proven infection. Early intravenous broad-spectrum antibiotic therapy (covering Gram positive, Gram negative, and anaerobic species) is imperative in any case of suspected Fournier's disease. Suggested regimens include extended-spectrum penicillin/beta-lactamase inhibitors (such as ampicillin/sulbactam or piperacillin/tazobactam), a third generation cephalosporin plus clindamycin, or vancomycin plus metronidazole. In addition, there is some emerging literature to suggest a potent synergistic role of clindamycin along with beta-lactam antimicrobials (ie, clindamycin plus piperacillin/tazobactam) in combating necrotizing soft tissue infections, particularly when Streptococcal species are involved.^54,55 The role of hyperbaric oxygen therapy in the management of Fournier's disease has been suggested, although its utility is still the subject of much debate in the medical literature.^56,57 Although early consultation and administration of broad-spectrum antibiotics is indicated in all suspected cases of Fournier's disease, surgical debridement is imperative and remains the definitive treatment.^58,59,60

Antibiotics are the cornerstone of therapy for epididymitis. Antimicrobial selection is guided by patient demographics: younger (less than 35 years old) sexually active males are treated with agents to cover Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Chlamydia trachomatis, such as ceftriaxone (250 mg IM single dose) with oral doxycycline (10 day course). It is important to note that both the dosage and duration of antimicrobial treatment differ for epididymitis when compared with urethritis. For instance, a typical treatment regimen for isolated urethritis is a single dose of ceftriaxone 125 mg (IM) plus azithromycin 1 g (PO), whereas typical treatment for epididymitis is ceftriaxone 250 mg (IM) plus doxycycline 100 mg (PO) twice daily for 10 days. Importantly, fluoroquinolones (such as ciprofloxacin) are no longer recommended for the treatment of gonococcal infections owing to increased resistance patterns in the United States and abroad.⁶¹

Epididymitis may also occur in prepubescent males.⁶² This is thought by some to be caused by reflux of sterile urine into the epididymis, which may result from congenital GU anomalies, although the precise mechanisms remain unclear.^63,64 Recommendations regarding treatment of the resulting inflammation vary from treating all boys with antibiotics⁶⁵ to limiting their use to patients with documented urinary findings (pyuria, positive urine culture).⁶³ If utilized, prophylactic antibiotics should cover the common urinary pathogens. Treatment for other STDs is covered in Table 7.

 

 

Priapism

Paraphimosis

Paraphimosis is relatively unique among the GU emergencies, as it may be managed by the emergency practitioner without the need for emergent specialty consultation. The most commonly employed maneuvers involve initial alleviation of distal penis and prepuce edema, followed by reduction of the glans penis back through the constricting band of foreskin. (See Figure 5.) Paraphimosis Reduction.) ⁷² Various techniques to assist in alleviation of glans and prepuce edema have been reported in the medical literature. These include non-pharmacologic methods (ice water filled glove,^73,74 circumferential pressure with a gloved hand,⁷⁵ circumferential compressive elastic dressing,⁷⁶) pharmacologic treatments (application of granulated sugar to the surface of the glans and prepuce,⁷⁷ injection of hyaluronidase into the edematous prepuce,⁷⁸) and minimally invasive techniques (placement of multiple puncture wounds in the swollen glans or prepuce with a goal of expressing edema fluid.^79-81) An evidence-based review in 2004 concluded that given the lack of comparative or randomized trials, current treatment recommendations are based solely on local practice preference.⁸² However, these treatment recommendations are to be discouraged as there is no firm evidence that they work. The only definitive treatment here is reduction of the foreskin with the thumb and index fingers or incision of the phimotic ring by a practitioner experienced in this procedure.

 

 

Special Circumstances

In terms of diagnosis, vigilance is essential in order to arrive at the possibility of a GU source for a vague or non-specific complaint in the first place. As such, in males of any age, it is important to always consider GU pathology in your differential and take the time to look "down there." This is particularly important in males at the extremes of age or otherwise non-communicative patients. Parents or caretakers may be entirely unaware of the possibility of a GU etiology of a patient's symptoms.

Immuno-compromised patients may exhibit an atypical (or "blunted") response (ie, blunted fever, pain, or peritoneal signs) to medical or surgical disease. Always be weary of pain that appears to be "out of proportion" to what you see on examination. This is the hallmark of necrotizing fasciitis (Fournier's).

Finally, although essential in any patient, it is particularly important to address privacy and confidentiality issues in the peripubescent age group. Otherwise, you may find yourself forced to make decisions with limited information from the history or examination.

Controversies/Cutting Edge

High Resolution Ultrasound In The Evaluation Of The "Acute Scrotum"

Color flow Doppler ultrasonography (CDUS) has long been regarded as the diagnostic modality of choice in indeterminate presentations of the acute scrotum. However, sporadic reports began to emerge in the early 1990's regarding the limitations (ie, false negatives) of sonography in the diagnosis of testicular torsion.^83-89 Many of these studies are limited by small numbers and retrospective design (case reports or small case series). Despite this, the most concerning data comes from Baud90 and Kalfa,⁴¹ where 6 of 23 cases (26%) and 50 of 208 cases (24%) of testicular torsion, respectively, had demonstrated flow on CDUS. CDUS assessment may reveal the presence of seemingly adequate intratesticular arterial flow with partial torsion, which can be very misleading to the practitioner. Similar limitations of CDUS resulting from partial torsion have been documented in animal models.⁹¹

Given the potential limitations of CDUS, investigations began to focus on alternative techniques to improve the diagnostic accuracy of sonography in the evaluation of the "acute scrotum." Recent reports have suggested that the addition of high-resolution ultrasound (HRUS) imaging of the spermatic cord to standard CDUS imaging of the testicle may improve diagnostic accuracy.^92,93 However, Karmazyn⁹⁴ noted some important limitations of HRUS imaging. Importantly, the spermatic cord may appear entirely normal during the "detorsed" interval with intermittent torsion-detorsion. In addition, a "tortuous" spermatic cord (resulting from inflammation and edema in epididymitis) may be very difficult to differentiate from a "coiled" or "kinked" spermatic cord as seen with testicular torsion.

The latest (and greatest) evidence for HRUS comes from Kalfa et al,⁴¹ who conducted a multicenter investigation of 919 patients (208 patients with proven testicular torsion). They found that HRUS was highly sensitive for ruling-in as well as highly specific for ruling-out spermatic cord torsion (HRUS detected a "twist" of the cord in 96% (199/208) of patients with testicular torsion; HRUS= revealed a normal "linear" cord in 99% (705/711) of patients without testicular torsion). The authors concluded that given its high sensitivity and specificity, HRUS can significantly improve the management of children presenting with an acute scrotum. However, they were careful to point out that spermatic cord HRUS requires extensive practice and experience, is highly operator-dependent, and therefore should be performed by a radiologist experienced in the procedure (and not by an emergency physician with limited experience.)

So, what's the bottom line regarding sonography for the diagnosis of testicular torsion? While excellent overall, important limitations of CDUS exist (false negatives). The addition of HRUS imaging of the spermatic cord appears to significantly improve the overall diagnostic accuracy of sonography. HRUS may be a very useful adjunct; however, it may not yet be ready for "prime time" at many centers. The real bottom line is if the HRUS is not definitively diagnostic, the scrotum needs to be explored as soon as possible.

Disposition

Documentation Keys And Patient Teaching Tips

Documentation keys are presented in Table 8. Documentation of the time and nature of any discussions with specialty consultants (ie, urology, radiology, general surgery, pediatric surgery) is crucial. In addition, always document the results of the GU examination in the evaluation of any non-verbal patient. This is particularly important in the elderly population, as well as in infants with inconsolable crying.

 

 

Summary

Male GU problems are anxiety provoking for all parties involved. Precise diagnosis of GU problems is not always feasible in the ED setting. However, differentiating GU emergencies from GU urgencies takes precedence over definitive diagnosis. Identification of testicular torsion is of paramount importance, given its implications for future fertility. The 2 other most common causes of the "acute scrotum" are epididymitis and appendage torsion, both of which can typically be managed in the outpatient setting once testicular torsion has been excluded. Other GU emergencies include Fournier's disease, priapism, paraphimosis, and any form of GU trauma. With a careful history and thorough examination, as well as ultrasound assistance when needed, the initial phase of these "high-risk" conditions can be skillfully and effectively managed by the emergency practitioner.

Key Points

1. There are five GU emergencies: testicular torsion, Fournier's disease (necrotizing fasciitis of the perineum), priapism, paraphimosis, and any form of GU trauma unless proven otherwise.
2. Differentiating true GU emergencies (requiring prompt action) from urgent conditions (safe for outpatient management) takes precedence over definitive diagnosis in the majority of cases.
3. Ultrasound examination is widely available and extremely useful at differentiating among the etiologies of acute scrotal pain, including indeterminate presentations; it is also an invaluable tool in assessing distal penile vascular integrity.
4. In cases of suspected testicular torsion, emergent specialist consultation is imperative: remember that "time is testicle," so be careful to avoid" castration by procrastination."
5. The appearance of overt physical findings in Fournier's disease may indicate that it's too late to mitigate patient morbidity and mortality. The hallmark of this disease is pain out of proportion to physical findings in any high-risk (ie, diabetic or other immune compromised) patient.
6. Although largely of unproven benefit, the initial treatment for priapism is the same regardless of precipitating cause- a trial of oral or subcutaneous terbutaline (a bete-adrenergic agonist) remains the first-line ED treatment.
7. Paraphimosis is relatively unique among the GU emergencies, as successful reduction can often be performed solely by the emergency physician, without the need for speicalty consultation.
8. Consider consulting urology (telephone conversation at a minimum) in all but the most minor cases of GU trauma to help guide clinical decision making and patient disposition.

Pitfalls To Avoid

1. "They were new parents; their newborn was afebrile and looked fine overall, just a bit fussy. I figured it was most likely colic and sent them home to follow-up with their pediatrician the following morning."

2. "Sure, he was a bashful teenager, but I asked if there were any other symptoms, and the answer

was a definitive ‘no.’ How was I supposed to know that he had testicular pain?"

3. "He was sent from the nursing home for fever. There was no mention of scrotal signs or symptoms anywhere in the nursing home documentation."

4. "I figured he was just another drug seeker. He was complaining of severe perineal pain, but the skin examination would barely qualify as a ‘faint’ cellulitis!"

5. "We placed the urinary catheter, but when it became clear that he would be safe for ED discharge, we decided to remove it. We didn't even think to check his foreskin prior to sending

him home."

6. "There was a malodorous stench in the room, but the pain was present for several days and he reported a yellow-green discharge. I just empirically treated him for urethritis without even looking down there!"

7. "Urology said to get the sonogram, and they would be in to see the patient first thing in the morning. I didn't realize that testicular salvage rates decreased so precipitously with time!"

8. "It was a busy shift, and I only had a few minutes with the patient. He was complaining of left testicular pain, so I decided to save a step by examining the left side first."

9. "He's now getting a head CT after ‘hitting the deck’ during my GU examination!"

10. "They talk about Prehn's sign in every textbook… I always thought that it was one of those key exam features that truly stood the test of time!"

Cost-Effective Strategies

• For males presenting with GU complaints, standard laboratory testing is useless in the vast majority of cases. Routine investigations (CBC and chemistry panel) add little to distinguish among the causes of acute scrotal or penile pain. Caveats: A urinalysis ( and urine culture may be helpful in assessing for uninary tract infection. In addition, it may provide valuable information in the diagnosis of epididymitis. Also, in the case of Fournier's disease, comprehensive laboratory testing should be undertaken to assess for the many physiologic derangements that may be present in association with this potentially devastating disease.
• It is prudent to invest in an ultrasound examination in "indeterminate presentation," as the acute scrotum is a very high-risk complaint from a medicolegal perspective. Caveat: 'time is testicle,' so be careful to avoid' castration through procrastination!' In a patient of appropriate age, with suggestive findings by history and on examiantion, specialty consultation takes precedence over confirmatory radiographic testing. Precious time may be wasted in the radiology suite. As an alternative, focus on activating the pathways necessary in order to get the patient to the operating room for surgical exploration as rapidly as possible.
• You may not need the urology (or pediatric surgery) consultant to come in from home after-all. Paraphimosis is relatively unique among the GU emergencies, as it can frequently be managed solely by the emergency physician. Although numerous techniques to assist in paraphimosis reduction have been reported in the medical literature, the time-tested method of manual reducton using your thumb/ index digits is all that is typically required. Caveat: of your initial trials of reduction are met without success, it is prudent to summon the assistance of your more experienced colleagues!.
• No need to look beyond...the medicine chest? Removal of the offending hair from the coronal sulcus in an infant presenting with a hair tourniquet entrapment injury can be challenging. It has been reported that over-the-counter chemical depilatories have been used successfully in the removal of digital (finger, toe) hair tourniquents suggesting their utility for genital hair tourniquets as well.⁹⁵ Caveat: although it has been reported in the medical literature, this recommendation is extrapolated from comparatively weak (case series) and limited date regarding the treatment of digital (finget, toe) hair tourniquets.

Case Conclusion

Clinical Pathway For The Treatment Of "Acute Scrotum"

Clinical Pathway For The Treatment Of Penile Pain And Swelling

Tables and Figures

References

Evidence-based medicine requires a critical appraisal of the literature based upon study methodology

and number of subjects. Not all references are equally robust. The findings of a large, prospective, randomized, and blinded trial should carry more weight than a case report.

To help the reader judge the strength of each reference, pertinent information about the study, such as the type of study and the number of patients in the study, will be included in bold type following the reference, where available.

1. Matteson JR, Stock JA, Hanna MK et al. Medicolegal aspects of testicular torsion. Urology 2001;57:4:783-7. (Retrospective, 39 malpractice cases)
2. Munkelwitz R, Gilbert BR. Are boxer shorts really better? A critical analysis of the role of underwear type in male subfertility. J Urol 1998;160:1329-1333. (Prospective, 97 patients)
3. Kellogg N, American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Child Abuse and Neglect. The evaluation of sexual abuse in children. Pediatrics 2005 Aug;116(2):506-12. (Consensus Practice Guideline)
4. Klin B, Lotan G, Efrati Y et al. Acute idiopathic scrotal edema in children - revisited. J Pediatr Surg 2002;37:8:1200-2. (Retrospective, 38 patients)
5. Mushtaq I, Fung M, Glasson MJ. Retrospective review of paediatric patients with acute scrotum. ANZ J Surg 2003;73(1-2):55-8. (Retrospective, 204 patients)
6. Varga J, Zikovic D, Grebeldinger S, Somer D. Acute scrotal pain in children - ten years' experience. Urol Int 2007;78:1:73-7. (Retrospective, 256 patients)
7. Sidler D, Brown RA, Millar AJ et al. A 25-year review of the acute scrotum in children. S Afr Med J 1997;87:12:1696-8. (Retrospective, 199 patients)
8. Lewis AG, Bukoswki TP, Jarvis PD et al. Evaluation of the acute scrotum in the emergency department. J Pediatr Surg 1995;30:2:277-82. (Retrospective, 238 patients)
9. Melekos MD, Asbach HW, Markou SA. Etiology of acute scrotum in 100 boys with regard to age distribution. J Urol 1988;139:1023-5. (Retrospective, 100 patients)
10. Makela E, Lahdes-Vasama T, Rajakorpi H, Wikstrom S. A 19-year review of paediatric patients with acute scrotum. Scand J Surg 2007;96:1:62-6. (Retrospective, 388 children)
11. Van Langen AMM, Gal S, Hulsmann AR, De Nef JJEM. Acute idiopathic scrotal edema: four cases and a short review. Eur J Pediatr 2001;160:7:455-6. (Case Series, 4 patients)
12. Adams JR, Mata JA, Venable DD et al. Fournier's disease in children. Urology 1990 May;35:5:439-41. (Case Report; Comprehensive Literature Review, 55 cases)
13. Ameh EA, Dauda MM, Sabiu L et al. Fournier's gangrene in neonates and infants. Eur J Pediatr Surg 2004;14:418-421. (Retrospective, 12 patients)
14. Wolf JS Jr, Gomez R, McAninch JW. Human bites to the penis. J Urol 1992;147:5:1265-7. (Case Series, 5 cases)
15. Gomes CM, Ribeiro-Filho L, Giron AM et al. Genital trauma due to animal bites. J Urol 2000;165:80-83. (Retrospective, 10 cases)
16. Huntely JS, Bourne MC, Munro FD, Wilson-Storey D. Troubles with the foreskin: one hundred consecutive referrals to paediatric surgeons. J Roy Soc Med 2003;96:449-51. (Prospective, 100 cases)
17. Thirchelvam N, Nayak P, Mostafid H. Emergency dorsal slit for balanitis with retention. J Roy Soc Med 2004;97:205-6. (Case Report)
18. Seng YJ, Moissinac K. Trauma induced testicular torsion: a reminder for the unwary. J Accid Emerg Med 2000;17:381-2. (Case Report and Review, 15 cases total)
19. Morey AF, Metro MJ, Carney KJ et al. Consensus on genitourinary trauma: external genitalia. BJU Int 2004;94:507-515. (Consensus Guidelines)*
20. Ciftci AO, Senocak ME, Tanyel FC et al. Clinical predictors for differential diagnosis of acute scrotum. Eur J Pediatr Surg 2004;14:5:333-8. (Retrospective, 160 patients)*
21. Jefferson RH, Perez LM, Joseph DB. Critical analysis of the clinical presentation of acute scrotum: a 9-year experience at a single institution. J Urol 1997;158:(3 Pt 2):1198-200. (Retrospective, 115 patients)
22. Kadish HA, Bolte RG. A retrospective review of pediatric patients with epididymitis, testicular torsion, and torsion of testicular appendages. Pediatrics 1998;102:1:73-6. (Retrospective, 90 patients)
23. Rabinowitz R. The importance of the cremasteric reflex in acute scrotal swelling in children. J Urol 1984;132:89-90. (Prospective, 245 patients)*
24. Caldamome AA, Valvo JR, Altebarmakian VK et al. Acute scrotal swelling in children. J Pediatr Surg 1984;19:581-4. (Prospective, 150 patients)
25. Caesar RE, Kaplan GW. The incidence of the cremasteric reflex in normal boys. J Urol 1994;152:779-80. (Prospective, 225 patients)
26. Feldstein MS. Re: The importance of the cremasteric reflex in acute scrotal swelling in children. J Urol 1985;133:488. (Case Report, Letter)
27. Hughes ME, Currier SJ, Della-Giustina D. Normal cremasteric reflex in a case of testicular torsion. Am J Emerg Med 2001;19:3:241-2. (Case Report)
28. Nelson CP, Williams JF, Bloom DA. The cremasteric reflex: a useful but imperfect sign in testicular torsion. J Pediatr Surg 2003;38:1248-9. (Case Report)
29. Prehn CT. A new sign in the differential diagnosis between torsion of the spermatic cord and epididymitis. J Urol 1934; 32:191-200. (Case Series; 2 cases)
30. Noske HD, Kraus SW, Altinkilic BM, Weidner W. Historical milestones regarding torsion of the scrotal organs. J Urol 1998;159:1:13-16. (Historical Survey)
31. Dresner ML. Torsed appendage. Diagnosis and management: blue dot sign. Urology 1973;1:1:63-6.
32. Di Maggio C, Pescarini L, Talenti E et al. [Scrotal transillumination: method and results (author's translation - article in Italian)]. Radiol Med (Torino) 1981;67:10:733-7. (Retrospective, 48 patients)
33. Goldmeier D, Lamba H. Prolonged erections produced by dihydrocodeine and sildenafil. BMJ 2002;324:7353:1555. (Case Series, 2 patients)
34. Barton DJ, Sloan GM, Nichter LS et al. Hair-thread tourniquet syndrome. Pediatrics 1998;82:6:925-8. (Case Series, 6 patients; Comprehensive Literature Review, 60 cases)
35. Van Der Horst C, Martinez Portillo FJ, Seif C et al. Male genital injury: diagnostics and treatment. BJU Int 2004;93:927-930. (Review)
36. Eke N. Fracture of the penis. Br J Surg 2002;89:555-65. (Comprehensive Literature Review, 1331 cases)
37. United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Sexually transmitted diseases treatment guidelines, 2006. MMWR 2006;55(No. RR-11). Available from: http://www.cdc.gov/std/treatment/ default.htm (Treatment Guideline)
38. Visser AJ, Heyns CF. Testicular function after torsion of the spermatic cord. BJU Int 2003;92:200-3. (Review, Meta-analysis)
39. Pepe P, Panella P, Pennisi M, Aragona F. Does color Doppler sonography improve the clinical assessment of patients with acute scrotum? Eur J Radiol 2006;60:1:120-4. (Prospective, 150 patients)
40. Older RA et al. Expert Panel on Urologic Imaging. Acute onset of scrotal pain (without trauma, antecedent mass). [online publication]. Reston (VA): American College of Radiology (ACR); 2005. (Consensus Practice Guideline)
41. Kalfa N, Veyrac C, Lopez M et al. Multicenter assessment of ultrasound of the spermatic cord in children with acute scrotum. J Urol 2007;177:1:297-301. (Retrospective and Prospective Data (amalgamation, 919 patients)*
42. Sidhu PS. Clinical and imaging features of testicular torsion: role of ultrasound. Clin Radiol 1999;54:343-352. (Comprehensive Review)
43. Haecker F-M, Hauri-Hohl A, von Schweinitz D. Acute epididymitis in children: a 4-year retrospective study. Eur J Pediatr Surg 2005;15:180-6. (Retrospective, 49 patients)
44. Yang DM, Lim JW, Kim JE et al. Torsed appendix testis. Gray scale and color Doppler sonographic findings compared with a normal appendix testis. J Ultrasound Med 2005;24:87-91. (Retrospective, 12 children)
45. Lee SH, Bak CW, Choi MH et al. Trauma to male genital organs: a 10-year review of 156 patients, including 118 treated by surgery. BJU Int; 2007; Oct 8 - Epub ahead of print. (Retrospective, 156 patients)
46. Buckley JC, McAninch JW. Use of ultrasonography for the diagnosis of testicular injuries in blunt scrotal trauma. J Urol 2006;175:175-8. (Retrospective, 65 patients)
47. Blaivas M, Sierzenski P, Lambert M. Emergency evaluation of patients presenting with acute scrotum using bedside ultrasonography. Acad Emerg Med 2001;8:1:90-93. (Retrospective, 36 patients)
48. Nussbaum AR, Bulas D, Shalaby-Rana E et al. Color Doppler sonography and scintigraphy of the testis: a prospective, comparative analysis in children with acute scrotal pain. Pediatr Emerg Care 2002;2002:18:2:67-71. (Prospective, 46 children)
49. Terai A, Yoshimura K, Ichioka K et al. Dynamic contrast-enhanced subtraction magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnostics of testicular torsion. Urology 2006;67:1278-82. (Retrospective, 39 patients)
50. Wanatabe Y, Dohke M, Ohkubo K et al. Scrotal disorders: evaluation of testicular enhancement patterns at dynamic contrast enhanced subtraction MR imaging. Radiology 2000;217:1:219-227. (Prospective, 42 patients)
51. Rajan DK, Scharer KA. Radiology of Fournier's gangrene. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1998;170:1:163-8. (Comprehensive Review)
52. Nash WG. Acute torsion of the spermatic cord: reduction, immediate relief. BMJ 1893;1:742-3. (Seminal Report - punn intended!)
53. Garel L, Dubois J, Azzie G et al. Preoperative manual detorsion of the spermatic cord with Doppler ultrasound monitoring in patients with intravaginal testicular torsion. Pediatr Radiol 2000;30:41-44. (Case Series, 7 cases; Meta-Analysis, 98 previously reported cases)
54. Sriskandan S, McKee A, Hall L, Cohen J. Comparative effects of clindamycin and ampicillin on superantigenic activity of Streptococcus pyogenes. J Antimicrob Chemother 1997;40:275-77. (Bench Research)
55. Zimbelman J, Palmer A, Todd J. Improved outcome of clindamycin compared with beta-lactam antibiotic treatment for invasive Streptococcus pyogenes infection. Pediatr Infect Dis J 1999;18:12:1096-1100. (Retrospective, 56 children)
56. Mindrup SR, Kealey GP, Fallon B. Hyperbaric oxygen for the treatment of Fournier's gangrene. J Urol 2005;173:6:1975-7. (Retrospective, 42 cases)
57. Jallali N, Withey S, Butler PE. Hyperbaric oxygen as adjuvant therapy in the management of necrotizing fasciitis. Am J Surg 2005;189:462-66. (Comprehensive Evidence-Based Literature Review)
58. Eke N. Fournier's gangrene: a review of 1726 cases. Br J Surg 2000;87:6:718-28. (Comprehensive Literature Review, 1726 cases)
59. Corman JM, Moody JA, Aronson WJ. Fournier's gangrene in a modern surgical setting: improved survival with aggressive management. BJU Int 1999;84:85-8. (Retrospective, 23 cases)
60. Basoglu M, Ozbey I, Selcuk Atamanalp S et al. Management of Fournier's gangrene: review of 45 ases. Surg Today 2007;37:558-63. (Retrospective, 45 patients)
61. United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Update to CDC's sexually transmitted diseases treatment guidelines, 2006: fluoroquinolones no longer recommended for treatment of gonococcal infections. MMWR 2007;56:14:332-6. (Treatment Guideline Update)
62. Klin B, Zlotkevich L, Horne T et al. Epididymitis in childhood: a clinical retrospective study over 5 years. Isr Med Assoc J 2001;3:833-5. (Retrospective, 65 patients)
63. Lau P, Anderson PA, Giacomantonio JM, Schwarz RD. Acute epididymitis in boys: are antibiotics indicated? Br J Urol 1997;79:797-800. (Prospective, 48 patients)
64. Somekh E, Gorenstein A, Serour F. Acute epididymitis in boys: Evidence of a post-infectious etiology. J Urol 2004;171:1:391-4. (Prospective, 44 patients)
65. McAndrew HF, Pemberton R, Kikiros CS, Gollow I. The incidence and investigation of acute scrotal problems in children. Pediatr Surg Int 2002;18:435-7. (Retrospective, 100 patients)
66. Lowe JC, Jarow JP. Placebo-controlled study of oral terbutaline and pseudoephedrine in management of prostaglandin E1-induced prolonged erections. Urology 1993;42:1:51-4. (Prospective, 75 patients)*
67. Govier FE, Jonsson E, Kramer-Levin D. Oral terbutaline for the treatment of priapism. J Urol 1994;151:878-9. (Prospective, 24 patients)
68. Erectile Dysfunction Guideline Update Panel. The management of priapism. Baltimore (MD): American Urological Association, Inc.; 2003. (Consensus Practice Guideline)
69. Priyadarshi S. Oral terbutaline in the management of pharmacologically induced prolonged erection. Int J of Impotence Res 2004;16:424-6. (Prospective, 68 patients)
70. Adeyoju AB, Olujohungbe ABK, Morris J et al. Priapism in sickle-cell disease: incidence, risk factors and complications - an international multicentre study. BJU Int 2002;90:898-902. (Questionnaire, 130 patients, 18 physicians)
71. Maples BL, Hagemann TM. Treatment of priapism in pediatric patients with sickle cell disease. Am J Health Syst Pharm 2004; 61:355-63. (Comprehensive, Evidence-Based Review)
72. Choe JM. Paraphimosis: current treatment options. Am Fam Physician 2000;16:12:2623-6. (Review)*
73. Hougton GR. The ‘iced-glove’ method of treatment of paraphimosis. Brit J Surg 1973;60:11:876-7. (Case Series, 10 patients)
74. Nielson JB, Sorensen SS, Hojsgaard A. Paraphimosis treated with the ice glove method. Ugeskr Laeger 1982;144:2228-9. (Case Series, 10 patients)
75. Schenck GF. The treatment of paraphimosis. Am J Surg 1930;8:329. (Historical Report)
76. Ganti SU, Sayegh N, Addonizio JC. Simple method for reduction of paraphimosis. Urology 1985;25:77. (Case Series, 25 patients)
77. Kerwat R, Shandall A, Stephenson B. Reduction of paraphimosis with granulated sugar. Br J Urol 1998;82:755. (Case Report)
78. DeVries CR, Miller AK, Packer MG. Reduction of paraphimosis with hyaluronidase. Urology 1996;48:464-5. (Procedure Description, based on author's personal experience)
79. Hamdy FC, Hastie KJ. Treatment of paraphimosis: the ‘puncture’ technique. Br J Surg 1990;77:1186. (Procedure Description)
80. Barone JG, Fleisher MH. Treatment of paraphimosis using the "puncture" technique. Pediatr Emerg Care 1993 Oct;9(5):298-9. (Case Report)
81. Kumar V, Javle P. Modified puncture technique for reduction of paraphymosis. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2001;83:127-7. (Case Series, 45 patients)
82. Mackway-Jones K, Teece S. Ice, pins, or sugar to reduce paraphimosis. Emerg Med J 2004;21:77-8. (Evidence-Based Review, 33 studies included in analysis)
83. Burks DD, Markey BJ, Burkhard TK et al. Suspected testicular torsion and ischemia: evaluation with color Doppler sonography. Radiology 1990;175:815-21. (Prospective, 32 patients)
84. Ingram S, Hollman AS, Azmy A. Testicular torsion: missed diagnosis on color Doppler sonography. Ped Rad 1993;23:483. (Case Report)
85. Steinhardt GF, Boyarsky S, Mackey R. Testicular torsion: pitfalls of color Doppler sonography. J Urol 1993;150:461-2. (Case Series, 2 cases)
86. Yazbeck S, Patriquin HB. Accuracy of Doppler sonography in the evaluation of acute conditions of the scrotum in children. J Pediatr Surg 1994;29:9:1270-2. (Prospective, 19 cases)
87. Allen TD, Elder J. Shortcomings of color Doppler sonography in diagnosis of testicular torsion. J Urol 1995;154:4:1508-10. (Case Series, 5 cases)
88. Stehr M, Boehm R et al. Critical validation of color Doppler ultrasound in diagnostics of acute scrotum in children. Eur J Pediatr Surg 2003;13:386-92. (Prospective, 132 cases)
89. Frauscher F, Klauser A, Radmayr C. Ultrasonographic assessment of the scrotum. Lancet 2001;357:721-2. (Case Report, Letter)
90. Baud C, Veyrac C, Couture A et al. Spiral twist of the spermatic cord: a reliable sign of testicular torsion. Pediatr Radiol 1998;28:950-4. (Prospective, 30 patients)
91. Frush DP, Babcock DS, Lewis AG et al. Comparison of color Doppler sonography and radionuclide imaging in different degrees of torsion in rabbit testes. Acad Radiol 1995;2:945-51. (Prospective, Animal Model, 19 rabbits)
92. Arce JD, Cortes M, Vargas JC. Sonographic diagnosis of acute spermatic cord torsion. Rotation of the cord: a key to the diagnosis. Pediatr Radiol 2002;32:485-91. (Prospective, 6 patients)
93. Kalfa N, Veyrac C, Baud C et al. Ultrasonography of the spermatic cord in children with testicular torsion: impact on the surgical strategy. J Urol 2004;172:1692-5. (Prospective, 44 cases of testicular torsion)
94. Karmazyn B, Steinberg R, Kornreich L et al. Clinical and sonographic criteria of acute scrotum in children: a retrospective study of 172 boys. Pediatr Radiol 2004; 35(3):302-10. (Retrospective, 41 cases of testicular torsion)
95. Douglas DD. Dissolving hair wrapped around an infant's digit. J Pediatr 1977;91:162. (Case Series, 2 patients)